R. Kemala Nababan
Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, Norwegia

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Reformulation of Law Decision Bias on Restitution Payments in Sexual Violence Crimes (Comparison of Indonesia and The Netherlands) Panusunan Panusunan; Anis Widyawati; Dewi Sulistianingsih; R. Kemala Nababan
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i3.22109

Abstract

Sexual violence is an increasingly prevalent crime in Indonesia. Article 16 of Law Number 12 of 2022 on Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence states that, in addition to imprisonment, fines, or other criminal penalties as outlined in the Law, the judge is required to determine the amount of restitution for criminal acts of sexual violence that carry a sentence of four years in prison or more. One form of compensation available to victims of the criminal acts of sexual violence is restitution payments made by the defendant. However, many Panels of Judges still deny cases of the criminal acts of sexual violence restitution, particularly in verdicts where the defendant faces a four-year sentence or more. Several reasons explain why judges do not determine restitution payments by the defendant to the victim: the first is bias regarding the amount of compensation for victims in the judge’s decision; the second is that the request for payment restitution must be formally submitted; and the third concerns how to reformulate the determination of restitution in sexual violence cases (a comparison of Indonesia and the Netherlands).