Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Trunojoyo Law Review Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law
Faisal Fauzan
Sydney School of Graduate Research, Central Queensland University, Australia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
International Lawfare and Transactional Peacemaking: Indonesia’s ‘Board of Peace’ and the Question of Palestinian Sovereignty Chairul Fahmi; Muhammad Siddiq Armia; Mizaj Iskandar; Laila Muhammad Rasyid; Faisal Fauzan
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.33636

Abstract

The Board for Peace (BoP), established by President Trump, is integral to the execution of the America-First and transactional strategy. This board indicates a transition in international collaboration from multilateralism under the UN mandate to a multi-corporate framework for handling the post-conflict transition in Gaza. This article analyses the legitimacy of the BoP under international law and the ramifications of Indonesia's permanent membership and its allocation of one billion US dollars to the BoP, while also evaluating its implications for Palestinian sovereignty and the international legal system. This research utilizes an interdisciplinary approach that combines international law, political economy, and international relations. The research indicates that the creation of the BoP was prompted by UN Security Council Resolution 2803, although it has diverged from the resolution's aims. Moreover, the BoP has invalidated the 2024 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) about the Palestinian people's right to self-determination. Moreover, the BoP, which possesses a comprehensive strategy for Gaza's reconstruction post-Israel's devastation, represents an infringement on the rights of the Palestinian populace in Gaza, undermines Palestinian sovereignty, overlooks the Palestinian Authority, and imposes a fiscal obligation on nations, especially permanent members like Indonesia. This paper asserts that the BoP framework is designed exclusively to sustain informal imperialism that advantages Israel, hinders the two-state solution, and constrains Indonesia’s foreign policy—ideally independent and proactive—under the influence of U.S. interests during the Trump administration.
The Position of the Notary Supervisory Council in the Indonesian State Administration System Mohammad Nurul Huda; Laila Muhammad Rasyid; Faisal Fauzan; Bhismoadi Tri Wahyu Faizal
Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law
Publisher : CV. Pustaka Parawali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71239/jicl.v3i2.273

Abstract

This research aims to critically analyze and examine the position of the Notary Supervisory Council (Majelis Pengawas Notaris or MPN) within the state structure of the Republic of Indonesia, in accordance with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This article addresses an academic gap by providing an in-depth analysis of the MPN's position from the perspective of constitutional law and the separation of powers (trias politica), which previous studies have overlooked in favor of technical operational aspects or state administrative law. The methodology employed is normative legal research, utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials analyzed include the 1945 Constitution, the Law on the Notary Profession, and the Law on Government Administration, supported by secondary and tertiary legal materials. The status of the MPN is considered sui generis and fraught with paradoxes. Institutionally, the MPN is established through ministerial attributive authority; however, the form of authority delegation is unclear (delegation or mandate), creating legal uncertainty. Furthermore, the MPN is classified as a state administrative body/official, but its ambiguous legal status affects accountability and budgeting, resulting in supervisory inefficiencies. The MPN's unclear position within the state system may create conflicts of interest, as the executive supervises a judicial function (notaries), and hinder the realization of good governance. Therefore, re-affirming the MPN's legal status through regulatory revision is necessary to ensure legal certainty and effective supervision.
Co-Authors Bhismoadi Tri Wahyu Faizal Chairul Fahmi Laila Muhammad Rasyid Mizaj Iskandar Usman Mohammad Nurul Huda Muhammad Siddiq Armia