Abdul Kahar Syarifuddin
Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton; Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Urgency of Pre-Marital Counseling in Preventing Domestic Violence: A Case Study at the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) in Mawasangka District, Central Buton Dina Pratiwi; La Jusu; Abdul Kahar Syarifuddin
Social Science Academic Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/ssa.10572

Abstract

Domestic violence remains a serious threat to family wellbeing in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the key success factors of pre-marital guidance at the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA) of Mawasangka District in preventing domestic violence and to explore the value-internalization mechanisms that allow the preventive impact to endure without continued mentoring. The study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through participatory observation, in-depth interviews with the head of the KUA, the marriage registrar (penghulu), and couples who participated in the guidance program, as well as documentation. Data analysis followed the model of Miles et al., comprising the stages of condensation, display, and conclusion drawing. Data validity was ensured through source and method triangulation, member checking, and peer debriefing. The results show five key success factors: strong institutional commitment, credible and high-quality facilitators, a comprehensive material structure, an interactive-participatory method, and support from a religious socio-cultural environment. The value-internalization mechanism occurs through cognitive-emotional-spiritual learning, self-reflection that builds personal awareness, concrete-applicative knowledge transfer, the formation of mutual commitment, and the cultivation of a continuous-learning mindset. These findings contribute to SDGs Goals 3, 5, and 16 by presenting a cost-effective and replicable model of pre-marital guidance as a strategy for preventing domestic violence. This study extends the theoretical framework on preventive educational programs by showing that maximum success can be achieved even under limited resources through an effective value-internalization mechanism.
Resolution of Customary Land Disputes from the Perspective of Maqasid Syari'ah and the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA): A Case Study in Kadolo Katapi Village, BTN Bukit Sari, Baubau City Wa Ode Serlianti; Irma Purnamayanti; Abdul Kahar Syarifuddin
Social Science Academic Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the forms and characteristics of customary land disputes in Kadolo Katapi Village, BTN Bukit Sari, Baubau City, and to offer resolution solutions through the integration of Maqasid Shari'ah perspectives and the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). The study employs a qualitative approach with an empirical legal research design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentary studies, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model with source and method triangulation to ensure data validity. The findings reveal that land disputes in this area are multidimensional in nature, encompassing ownership disputes, possession conflicts, boundary disagreements, and rights transfer contestations rooted in the dualism between customary norms and national positive law, compounded by the scarcity of formal ownership documents. The tiered resolution mechanisms pursued through customary deliberation, institutional mediation, and litigation have proven insufficient in delivering substantive justice acceptable to all parties. The Maqasid Shari'ah perspective, through the principles of al-shulh (peaceful settlement), al-'adalah (substantive justice), and dar' al-mafasid (prevention of harm), offers an integrative model that complements the UUPA in achieving dispute resolution that is both juridically valid and substantively just, with direct implications for the attainment of SDG 1, SDG 11, and SDG 16.