Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC OF MANDALIKA (JSM)
Sahlan
Universitas Bima International MFH
Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Problematika konsultasi kesehatan online (telemedicine) dalam perspektif hukum positif indonesia Khairunisyah; Adhar; Sahlan; Fitria Binti Masdor S
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 7 No. 8 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jomla.v7i8.6511

Abstract

This study analyzes the issues surrounding online health consultations (telemedicine) from the perspective of Indonesian positive law. The research questions examined in this study include: first, what are the legal policies governing the implementation of telemedicine in Indonesia? and second, what are the legal challenges regarding the protection of personal data, medical malpractice, and the use of digital platforms in telemedicine services in Indonesia?. The research method used in this study is normative legal research. The approaches employed in this study include: a statutory approach, which involves analyzing laws related to telemedicine; and a conceptual approach, which involves reviewing relevant literature and legal doctrines pertaining to the issues under examination. The Research findings indicate that telemedicine regulations in Indonesia remain scattered across various regulations that are not yet fully comprehensive. Some regulations remain general in nature, are limited to services between healthcare facilities, or apply only under specific conditions such as a pandemic. On the other hand, legal challenges in telemedicine include the risk of personal data breaches due to weak system security, difficulties in determining liability in malpractice cases between healthcare providers and platform providers, and the continued lack of oversight over private e-health platforms that often operate outside of health regulations.
Co-Authors Adhar Fitria Binti Masdor S Khairunisyah