Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-fiqh : Journal of Islamic Studies
Siti Nur’aini
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Muhammadiyah Blora
Religion

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Mentimeter in Islamic Religious Education: A Systematic Review of Research Trends, Reported Pedagogical Impacts, and Implementation Challenges Risdiani; Gigih Setianto; Siti Nur’aini
Al-fiqh Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Al-fiqh : Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : CV Global Research Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59996/al-fiqh.v4i2.1188

Abstract

This study aims to map research trends, synthesize reported pedagogical impacts, and identify implementation challenges associated with Mentimeter in Islamic Religious Education (PAI). A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature searches were conducted in ScienceDirect, SINTA, and Google Scholar on 15 June 2026 for publications from 2021 to 2026. Of 150 identified records, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies covered quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research, with varied sample sizes and research contexts. Data were synthesized using thematic synthesis to identify recurring patterns. Across the reviewed literature, student participation and classroom interaction were frequently reported as pedagogical outcomes associated with Mentimeter use. Several studies also reported improvements in indicators of critical and creative thinking, although the evidence varied in study design, samples, and outcome measures. Reported implementation challenges included limited technological infrastructure, lecturers’ digital competencies, and institutional readiness. Overall, the evidence suggests that Mentimeter may support participatory and interactive IRE/PAI learning environments; however, the heterogeneous evidence is insufficient to establish causal effectiveness in improving critical and creative thinking. Further multi-site, rigorous, and longitudinal studies are needed.
Co-Authors Gigih Setianto Risdiani