<![CDATA[Article 69 of Law No. 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of money laundering is a norm that applies as a positive law in Indonesia which states that in order to be able to conduct investigations, prosecutions, and examinations in court hearings against money laundering crimes, it is not mandatory to prove the origin of the criminal offense first. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is how the application of independent crime on money laundering in the Indonesian criminal justice system ? How is the legal certainty of the application of independent crime to money laundering in the Indonesian criminal justice system ? The research method used is normative juridical with the approach of legislation, conceptual, case and comparison. Data were obtained from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. And analyzed by the method of legal certainty and law enforcement. This study focuses on the analysis of legal norms that regulate the context between the position of money laundering as a follow-up crime and as an independent crime. This research will refer more to literature review,legislation, and relevant literature to gain a deep understanding of money laundering. The result of this study is the possibility of proving the crime of money laundering by not first proving the origin of the crime of money laundering. Non-material criminal acts of their own origin at least include, but are not limited to: (a) passive money laundering perpetrators (article 607 paragraph (1) letter c of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code); (b) Uitloker or medeplechtigheid perpetrators of money laundering who are not involved with the original criminal offense ((article 607 paragraph (1) letter A of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 20 or in conjunction with Article 21 of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code); or (c) Third Party Money Laundering perpetrators. Furthermore, the non-materiele dader of the original crime is processed by law in accordance with the rules in the instrument Article 69 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of money laundering, can be caused by: (a) the perpetrator of the materiale Dader of the original crime has the status of a search list of people; or (b) the case file between the materiale Dader of the original crime and the non-materiale dader of the original crime is separated (splitshing) by a concurrent/almost simultaneous legal process.]]>
