Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Evolution of Dynamic Capability Theory Toward Dynamic Capability Theory 4.0 Aditya Halim Perdana Kusuma Putra; Syamsuri Rahim; L. Laela; Najla Gadira Amrul; Zanrina Nurul Safhira
Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): May - July
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grmilf.v6i3.1940

Abstract

Dynamic Capability Theory has undergone substantial conceptual development since its emergence in the 1990s, evolving from a process-oriented explanation of organizational adaptation into a multidimensional framework encompassing managerial, cognitive, social, relational, and systems-level mechanisms. This study examines the evolution of Dynamic Capability Theory and conceptualizes its contemporary development as Dynamic Capability Theory 4.0. Using a conceptual literature review and comparative synthesis of 101 studies on dynamic capabilities, the analysis traces the theoretical development across four evolutionary stages, from organizational routines and path-dependent processes to explicit microfoundations, managerial agency, social interaction, and multilevel systems integration. The findings demonstrate that the evolution of the theory is characterized by a progressive shift from implicit organizational routines toward the integration of sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring mechanisms with managerial cognition, entrepreneurial leadership, organizational design, interpersonal interaction, collective construction, and relational dynamics. Dynamic Capability Theory 4.0 therefore positions dynamic capabilities not merely as organizational routines or isolated managerial actions, but as capabilities emerging from interactions among individuals, managers, organizational structures, relational networks, and environmental conditions. This perspective also reconciles path dependence with managerial agency and emphasizes flexible, decentralized, and adaptive organizational systems. The study contributes to the dynamic capability literature by providing an integrative evolutionary perspective that connects previously fragmented theoretical streams. Nevertheless, the theory remains conceptually evolving, requiring further empirical validation, clearer construct boundaries, and stronger multilevel operationalization across different organizational and environmental contexts.
Dynamic Capability Theory in Strategic Management: A Systematic Review of SME Adaptation, Resilience, and Adaptive Judgment in Developing Economies (1994-2026) Aditya Halim Perdana Kusuma Putra; Syamsuri Rahim; L. Laela; Najla Gadira Amrul; Zanrina Nurul Safhira
Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): June - November
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grsse.v6i2.2601

Abstract

Dynamic Capability Theory (DCT) has emerged as a foundational framework for understanding how firms adapt to environmental turbulence. However, classical DCT formulations have faced criticism for inadequately explaining adaptation failures among small and medium enterprises (SMEs), particularly in resource-constrained developing economies. Recent theoretical advances emphasize adaptive judgment and quality of adaptation as critical mechanisms linking dynamic capabilities to business resilience. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on DCT applications in SME contexts across developing economies from 1994 to 2026. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across four databases (SciSpace Deep Search, Scopus Full Text Search, Google Scholar, and Mendeley) using structured queries combining dynamic capabilities, SME adaptation, resilience, and developing economy contexts. From 919 initially identified records, 182 duplicates were removed, leaving 737 records for title/abstract screening. After applying eligibility criteria with a threshold score of ≥4.0, 41 studies underwent full-text assessment (threshold ≥4.5). Ultimately, 38 studies met inclusion criteria and were synthesized qualitatively. Data extraction focused on study design, geographic context, adaptive judgment mechanisms, key findings on dynamic capabilities, theoretical contributions, and risk of bias. Based on our results states the 38 included studies spanned 15 developing economies, with Indonesia (n=13), Pakistan (n=2), and Sri Lanka (n=2) most represented. Tourism (n=8), manufacturing (n=7), and retail/e-commerce (n=6) sectors dominated. Studies employed quantitative (n=26), qualitative (n=8), and mixed methods (n=4) designs. Three key themes emerged: (1) classical DCT limitations are addressed through emphasis on adaptive judgment, sensemaking, and entrepreneurial competencies that enable SMEs to navigate resource constraints; (2) modern DCT approaches integrate digital transformation, organizational agility, and ecosystem embeddedness as critical resilience mechanisms in developing economies; and (3) quality of adaptation—operationalized through business model innovation, strategic flexibility, and absorptive capacity—mediates the relationship between dynamic capabilities and business resilience. Conclusions: This review demonstrates that DCT has evolved substantially to address SME-specific challenges in developing economies. Adaptive judgment emerges as a critical cognitive capability that complements traditional sensing-seizing-transforming dimensions. The quality of adaptation, rather than mere possession of dynamic capabilities, determines resilience outcomes. Future research should employ longitudinal designs to capture capability development trajectories and explore contextual boundary conditions across diverse developing economy settings.