Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Satria Dwi Andyka
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Transendence Theory: Traces and Efforts to Build Transendent Legal Paradigm Zahwa Nabila Putri Maharani; Satrio Ulil Alab; Zella Arina Salsabila; Tyara Dhalih Alfia; Aji Saptaji; Satria Dwi Andyka
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

George R. Terry suggested that the basic concept of management is divided into 4 phases, namely Planning, Organizing, Actuating and Controlling which are patterns in compiling, processing, and managing an organization to be more organized in achieving its vision and mission. This article will examine the controlling stage as the last series that aims to improve and avoid deviations in employee performance in an organization or agency, also to ensure that every task in the organization and work can be properly maintained to achieve organizational goals. The Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture is the Government Internal Supervision Apparatus (APIP) responsible for carrying out internal supervision within the Ministry of Education and Culture to control the operational stage so that it is expected to create effectiveness and efficiency in performance as well as an effort to prevent irregularities by employees. Articles 195 and 196 of Permendikbud No. 45 of 2019 concerning Organization and Work of the Ministry of Education and Culture has mentioned the duties and functions of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture so as to provide clarity on its authorities and responsibilities which focuses on the formulation and implementation of policies on performance and finance within the Ministry of Education and Culture. The Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture divides the duties and responsibilities assigned to members according to their respective skills and abilities. The Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture divides the roles in two major units in its organizational structure in order to be able to support the implementation of various planned programs. However, in practice the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture cannot be separated from obstacles when carrying out supervision programs so that often the policies made by the Ministry of Education and Culture are not fully realized against their targets.
Legal Transendence Theory: Traces and Efforts to Build Transendent Legal Paradigm Zahwa Nabila Putri Maharani; Satrio Ulil Alab; Zella Arina Salsabila; Tyara Dhalih Alfia; Aji Saptaji; Satria Dwi Andyka
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

George R. Terry suggested that the basic concept of management is divided into 4 phases, namely Planning, Organizing, Actuating and Controlling which are patterns in compiling, processing, and managing an organization to be more organized in achieving its vision and mission. This article will examine the controlling stage as the last series that aims to improve and avoid deviations in employee performance in an organization or agency, also to ensure that every task in the organization and work can be properly maintained to achieve organizational goals. The Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture is the Government Internal Supervision Apparatus (APIP) responsible for carrying out internal supervision within the Ministry of Education and Culture to control the operational stage so that it is expected to create effectiveness and efficiency in performance as well as an effort to prevent irregularities by employees. Articles 195 and 196 of Permendikbud No. 45 of 2019 concerning Organization and Work of the Ministry of Education and Culture has mentioned the duties and functions of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture so as to provide clarity on its authorities and responsibilities which focuses on the formulation and implementation of policies on performance and finance within the Ministry of Education and Culture. The Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture divides the duties and responsibilities assigned to members according to their respective skills and abilities. The Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture divides the roles in two major units in its organizational structure in order to be able to support the implementation of various planned programs. However, in practice the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture cannot be separated from obstacles when carrying out supervision programs so that often the policies made by the Ministry of Education and Culture are not fully realized against their targets.
The Phenomenon of The Spread of Ransomware Virus that Infects Bank Systems and Legal Protection for Victims Affected by Ransomware Attacks Satria Dwi Andyka; Wardah Yuspin
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to understand the cases of Ransomware attacks within the banking sector. Rapid technological advance have significantly impacted the digital word, especially banking. The prevalence of Ransomware cases continues to increase each year due to the ineffectiveness of specific legal regulations governing ransomware cases. Additionally, there is a lack clarity regarding legal protection for victims affected by ransomware attacks. This study employs a normative juridical approach. Two sources of data are utilized: primary data source and secondary data. When viewed from Philipus M Hadjon's theoretical perspective, the research findings indicate ineffectiveness as it fails to fulfill other more general or universally applicable Legal Protection Theories. This implies a need for more consensus on legal protection. Many concentrates on specifics laws. This regulation of ransomware cases has not yet fully succeeded in reducing such incidents in Indonesia, as the number of cases continues to rise every year.
Co-Authors Aji Saptaji Satrio Ulil Alab Tyara Dhalih Alfia Wardah Yuspin Zahwa Nabila Putri Maharani Zella Arina Salsabila