Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
Cania, Murni
Unknown Affiliation
Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
PERBANDINGAN EVALUASI BENTUK ESSAY DAN MULTIPLE CHOICE WITH REASONING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS PESERTA DIDIK DALAM PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM KELAS VIII SMP 2 PATAMPANUA Cania, Murni; Mulianah, Sri; Hamdanah; Amiruddin Mustam
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 No. 2, Juni 2026 Publish
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.56136

Abstract

Critical thinking is a skill that students need to have to support the success of the learning process, especially in Islamic Religious Education. Initial observations indicate that this ability is still not optimal, especially in terms of analyzing information, understanding problems, and conveying reasons logically. This study uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design. The study involved two groups, namely class VIII.2 as the control group using essay-based evaluation and class VIII.4 as the experimental group applying multiple-choice evaluation with reasoning. Research data were collected through pre-test and post-test implementation, then analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics with the help of the IBM SPSS Statistics 26 program. The results of the study showed an increase in critical thinking skills in both classes. In the control class, the average score increased from 62.88 to 73.40, while in the experimental class it increased from 62.87 to 82.50. In addition, the results of the Independent Sample T-Test produced a significance value of 0.000 which is smaller than 0.05, thus indicating a significant difference between the two forms of evaluation. Thus, multiple choice evaluation with reasoning is proven to be more effective in improving students' critical thinking skills compared to essay-based evaluation..
Co-Authors Amiruddin Mustam Hamdanah