Rosyida Eka Dika Murti Murti
IPB University

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Aset Rumah Tangga, Pendapatan, Dan Strategi Nafkah Terhadap Kesejahteraan Penyadap Getah Pinus Di KPH Bandung Selatan, Provinsi Jawa Barat (The Influence of Household Assets, Income, and Livelihood Strategies on the Welfare of Pine Resin Tapper in the South Bandung Forest Management Unit, West Java Province) Rosyida Eka Dika Murti Murti; Bramasto Nugroho; Leti Sundawati
Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai (Journal of Watershed Management Research) Vol 10 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai (Journal of Watershed Managem
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Teknisi Kehutanan dan Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (APTKLHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59465/jppdas.2026.10.1.63-90

Abstract

Pine resin tapping provides important economic opportunities for communities living around the pine forests of the South Bandung Forest Management Unit (KPH). However, low wages and income instability compel tappers to adopt various livelihood strategies to support their household needs. This study aims to analyze the livelihood capital, income sources, strategies of pine resin tapper households, and their relationship to welfare levels. The study employed a quantitative approach supported by qualitative data obtained through surveys, Likert-scale questionnaires, interviews, observations, and documentation. Data were analyzed descriptively and statistically using Spearman’s rank correlation test. The findings show that social capital is the dominant component of household livelihood capital. The primary source of income comes from the forestry sector, specifically pine resin tapping and coffee cultivation. Non-forestry activities provide additional income. Most households apply dual livelihood strategies to maintain economic stability. The general level of household welfare is moderate. The correlation analysis showed no statistically significant relationship between livelihood capital and strategies, despite a positive coefficient was found. Likewise, no significant relationship was found between livelihood strategies and household welfare levels. These findings suggest that increasing livelihood capital and strategies do not automatically improve household welfare. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen livelihood capital so that the implemented strategies are not merely defensive (survival strategies) but also capable of improving welfare through high-value agricultural businesses and entrepreneurship without disrupting tapping activities. Further studies are recommended to examine the effect of income disparity, particularly between local tappers and outsiders, on work motivation and performance.