Muhammad Ansari Adista
Syiah Kuala University

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Prognostic Biochemical Markers in Traumatic Brain Injury: Which One is The Best? Juwita Juwita Juwita; Hidayaturrahmi Hidayaturrahmi Hidayaturrahmi; Muhammad Ansari Adista; Khairunnisa Khairunnisa Ichwan
JURNAL IMPLEMENTA HUSADA Vol 5, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : UMSU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/jih.v5i1.17534

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury is significant cause of disability and mortality; most of the patient are young and productive. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a common tool for classifying the injury, while imaging is used to diagnose. However, those modalities have limitations, which is mild to moderate brain injury due to the brain parenchymal changes cannot be found on imaging. Currently, several marker proteins (biochemical markers) of body fluids such as cerebrospinal fluid, blood or urine have been studied and are specific enough and easily accessible for classification and predict prognosis of traumatic brain injury. Biochemical markers which are widely used, considered effective and accurate for diagnosis and prognosis brain injury are S100β, GFAP, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and tau. This study will describe and compare the characteristics and role of each of these marker proteins.