Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MANDALA WIDYA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
I Ketut Oka Teguh Permana
Prodi PGSD Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi sebagai Strategi Responsif terhadap Keragaman Peserta Didik: Tinjauan Integratif Bukti Empiris M. Kholis Taptazono; Husnu Satya Yuda; Irza Maulana; I Ketut Oka Teguh Permana; Ismi Nabila Zakia
MANDALA WIDYA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): MANDALA WIDYA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Agustus 2026
Publisher : CV. Global Cendekia Inti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71094/mandalawidya.v2i3.246

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can provide rapid explanations, feedback, ideation, and language support, but the same affordances can displace cognitive work that assessment is intended to reveal. This integrative review synthesizes recent empirical studies, systematic reviews, and policy analyses on GenAI in higher education. Twenty traceable scholarly and institutional sources published primarily between 2022 and 2025 were analyzed through five themes: learning support, cognitive outsourcing, feedback, AI literacy, and academic integrity. The evidence suggests that learning benefits are strongest when students interrogate, verify, revise, and explain AI outputs rather than submit them as finished products. Risks increase when GenAI performs core reasoning, source evaluation, or composition without learner oversight. The review proposes a three-zone assessment architecture: AI-free tasks for measuring independent competence, AI-assisted tasks requiring process disclosure, and AI-required tasks when AI literacy itself is an intended outcome. Effective integration therefore depends less on universal permission or prohibition than on preserving cognitive ownership, transparent attribution, verification routines, and assessment designs that make students’ reasoning visible.
Co-Authors Husnu Satya Yuda Irza Maulana Ismi Nabila Zakia M. Kholis Taptazono