Diah Satyaningrum
Universitas Islam Nusantara, Bandung

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Legal Review of KRIS Implementation under Presidential Decree No. 59 of 2024 (amending Presidential Decree No. 82 of 2018 on Health Insurance) and Law No. 40 of 2004 on the National Social Security System Diah Satyaningrum; Happy Yulia Anggraeni
Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jis.v6i3.56032

Abstract

This study stems from concerns regarding normative changes to inpatient care classifications introduced by Presidential Regulation No. 59 of 2024—which reforms Presidential Regulation No. 82/2018—within the framework of Law No. 40 of 2004 on the National Social Security System (SJSN). It focuses on assessing whether the Standard Inpatient Class (KRIS) aligns, both legally and operationally, with the principles of equity and sustainability underpinning the National Health Insurance (JKN) scheme. The research aims to (1) map and interpret the KRIS regulations set forth in Presidential Regulation 59/2024 and (2) evaluate the alignment of KRIS implementation with SJSN principles. A normative legal research (doctrinal legal research) methodology was employed, utilizing statutory, legal-hermeneutic, and vertical-horizontal harmonization analysis approaches, alongside qualitative content analysis of legal and policy documents (2015–2025). The findings indicate that, doctrinally, Presidential Regulation 59/2024 establishes a legal framework coherent with SJSN objectives; however, substantive alignment depends on the finalization of implementing regulations, adjustments to tariffs and premiums, and hospital operational readiness. Data reveal inconsistencies in meeting the 12 KRIS criteria and a potential for service fragmentation arising from "top-up" mechanisms. The study concludes that while KRIS supports equity *de jure*, its achievement remains conditional *de facto*. Consequently, it recommends finalizing derivative regulations, adjusting financing structures, providing transition support for regional hospitals, and adopting an H-E-I (Law–Equity–Implementation) evaluative framework alongside further empirical study.