Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Studies in International Education Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Dian Ferriswara
Dr. Soetomo University
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
From National Education Policy to Local Implementation: Translating Institutional Collective Action for Multilevel Education Governance Iqbal Indrawan; Dian Ferriswara; Ulul Albab
International Journal of Studies in International Education Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): August: International Journal of Studies in International Education
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsie.v3i3.535

Abstract

Multilevel education policy implementation distributes authority, resources, information, and accountability across central, subnational, specialized, and school-level organizations. This article examines how such fragmentation may create coordination dilemmas and how public administrators can select context-sensitive institutional responses. It presents a conceptual review article using a theory-focused narrative literature review with a theory-to-practice orientation. Five documented Scopus search runs yielded 707 records; after EID deduplication, role-based screening, source-role prioritization, and full-text verification, 33 peer-reviewed journal articles formed the analytical corpus. The synthesis reconstructs the Institutional Collective Action (ICA) Framework around fragmented authority, interdependence, collaboration risk, expected joint gains, mechanism scope and authority, decision and autonomy costs, and outcome feedback. Application and criticism evidence indicates that transfer to education governance is defensible at the construct and mechanism level, but must remain sensitive to legal hierarchy, power asymmetry, implementation capacity, legitimacy, equity, and the gap between institutional formation and performance. The article translates ICA into six iterative domains: dilemma and interdependence diagnosis; problem, information, and task alignment; incentives, distribution, power, and autonomy; integration mechanism fit and institutional design; capacity, learning, and adaptive coordination; and performance, equity, endurance, and feedback. The framework offers a conceptual-translational contribution for diagnosing and designing multilevel implementation arrangements. It does not modify ICA theory, prescribe collaboration universally, or establish that coordination mechanisms cause education outcomes.
Legislative Oversight and Public Accountability in Indonesia’s Strategic Sector Governance: An Administrative Governance Perspective Jamhari Jamhari; Priyanto Priyanto; Dian Ferriswara
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): September: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v3i3.346

Abstract

This study develops an administrative-governance perspective on the role of legislative oversight in strengthening public accountability within the strategic sectors supervised by Commission VII of the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI) for the 2024–2029 period. Strategic sectors include industry, micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), tourism, creative economy, standardization, and public broadcasting/public information institutions, which involve high public value, regulatory complexity, budgetary implications, and inter-organizational relationships. The study employs an integrative conceptual review approach based on the problem-identification, literature-search, data-evaluation, analysis, and presentation framework of Whittemore and Knafl (2005), supported by qualitative analysis of official documents and relevant academic literature. The findings identify four accountability challenges in legislative oversight: information asymmetry, fragmented responsibility, weak follow-up of recommendations, and politicization of scrutiny. Based on these findings, the study develops the Legislative Oversight–Administrative Accountability (LOAA) framework, which integrates information acquisition, performance evaluation, public-value assessment, corrective direction, and follow-up accountability. This framework provides a normative-diagnostic approach to strengthen parliamentary oversight and offers propositions for future empirical testing of accountability mechanisms in strategic sector governance.
Co-Authors Iqbal Indrawan Jamhari Jamhari Priyanto Priyanto Ulul Albab