Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Sunarno Sunarno
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mpu Tantular, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of Law Enforcement Against Violations of Fishing Permits (SIPI), Fishing Vessel Permits (SIKPI), and Fisheries Business Permits (SIUP) Reviewed from Law Number 45 of 2009 Adi Suseno; Appe Hutauruk; Fendi Maruba Parlindungan Hutahaean; Sunarno Sunarno
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/ytw4sn54

Abstract

The licensing provisions in fisheries business activities, namely the Fisheries Business License (SIUP), Fishing License (SIPI), and Fish Transport Vessel License (SIKPI), are state control instruments for the orderly and sustainable utilization of fish resources. Violations of the obligation to own these permits are not merely administrative in nature, but are categorized as criminal acts in the fisheries sector as regulated in Law Number 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries as amended by Law Number 45 of 2009. This article aims to analyze the regulation of SIPI, SIKPI, and SIUP according to Law Number 45 of 2009 and their legal enforcement, by taking a case study of Decision Number 72/Pid.Sus-Prk/2024/PN.Rkb. This research uses a normative legal research method with a legislative approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The research results show that the regulation of SIUP, SIPI, and SIKPI has a clear legal basis but has undergone adjustments to norms after the implementation of the risk-based licensing policy through the Online Single Submission system, without eliminating the criminal nature of violations for large-scale business actors. Law enforcement in the field is still hampered by overlapping authority between institutions, limited supervisory facilities, difficulties in proving on the high seas, and disparities between sanctions and economic benefits for perpetrators, resulting in less than optimal deterrence. Strengthening of technology-based supervisory systems, institutional synergy, and a proportional legal approach between the ultimum remedium function for small-scale fishermen and firm action against large business actors and foreign vessels are needed
Normative Luridical Analysis of Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of The Criminal Acts of Fragment of Marriage Origins of Identity Agung Prasetyo; Appe Hutauruk; Fendi Maruba Parlindungan Hutahaean; Sunarno Sunarno
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/tdchqs93

Abstract

The criminal offense of falsifying marital history is a crime that rarely comes to light but has the potential to cause harm to others, especially when a person’s prior marital status is concealed from a prospective partner. This normative legal study analyzes the concept and legal framework of this criminal offense under Indonesian positive law, as well as its enforcement in practice, using legislative, case law, and conceptual approaches, with primary legal sources consisting of legislation and the Cibinong District Court Decision No. 260/Pid.B/2025/PN Cbi, which were analyzed using a qualitative-deductive method. The results of the study show that the concept of falsifying the origin of a marriage is not regulated as a standalone offense, but is scattered throughout Articles 277 –280 of the former Criminal Code, with the core of the offense consisting of the concealment of a legal impediment to marriage (wettelijk beletsel) accompanied by the element of the perpetrator’s knowledge (wetenschap), which intersects with the Marriage Law, the Population Administration Law, and their updates in Articles 401–404 of the National Criminal Code. Law enforcement faces structural challenges, the nature of complaint-based offenses, the difficulty of proving intent, the lack of integration between population and marriage data, and a legal culture that tends to resolve these issues through informal, family-based means.
Criminal Liability for the Misuse of Personal Data by Corporations: A Criminal Law and Corporate Liability Perspective Lebrina Wonlele; Appe Hutauruk; Hotman Sinambela; Sunarno Sunarno
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/dvgve850

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital technologies has significantly increased the risk of personal data misuse by corporations, creating complex legal challenges in determining corporate criminal liability. Although Indonesia enacted Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, the practical application of criminal liability against corporations remains problematic due to the limitations of traditional criminal law doctrines in attributing actus reus and mens rea to corporate entities. This study aims to analyze the formulation of corporate criminal liability for the misuse of personal data and to examine future criminal law policies that can strengthen legal enforcement against corporate offenders. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Primary legal materials consist of Indonesian legislation concerning personal data protection and corporate criminal liability, while secondary materials are derived from recent national and international scholarly journals. The findings demonstrate that conventional doctrines, particularly the Identification Theory, are insufficient to address decentralized digital corporations operating through automated decision-making systems. Instead, the Corporate Culture Model provides a more appropriate framework by evaluating organizational policies, governance structures, and institutional compliance in determining corporate fault. Furthermore, the study recommends integrating strict liability with a due diligence defense, strengthening digital forensic standards, recognizing AI-generated evidence, and adopting proportional turnover-based financial sanctions as effective mechanisms to enhance deterrence. These reforms are expected to establish a more adaptive and effective corporate criminal liability system capable of protecting personal data rights while ensuring legal certainty and accountability within Indonesia’s digital economy.
Co-Authors Adi Suseno Agung Prasetyo Appe Hutauruk Fendi Maruba Parlindungan Hutahaean Hotman Sinambela Lebrina Wonlele