Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Eksistensi Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Produk Cacat dalam Kerangka Hukum Positif Indonesia Khosnol Khotimah; Fitriyah Fitriyah; Hasan Yafiie
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i1.2411

Abstract

This study analyzes the existence and effectiveness of consumer protection against defective products within the framework of Indonesian positive law. It employs a normative legal research method using both statutory and conceptual approaches, focusing on Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999  concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK) and related regulations. The main discussion concerns the liability of business actors for defective products, particularly as regulated in Articles 19 to 28 of the UUPK. These provisions include the principle of strict liability, the obligation to provide consumers with accurate, clear, and honest information, as well as mechanisms for compensation and product recalls. The findings indicate that, normatively, the UUPK has established a fairly comprehensive legal framework for consumer protection. It regulates consumer rights, the obligations of business actors, and dispute resolution mechanisms through Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) and the courts. However, significant challenges remain in practice. The main issues include the absence of a clear and explicit definition of defective products, limited consumer awareness of their rights, weak supervision of business actors, and the use of standard contract clauses that tend to limit or transfer business liability. Therefore, legal policy reformulation is necessary through revisions to the UUPK that are more responsive to global legal developments, harmonized with international standards, and supported by stronger institutional authority and greater BPSK capacity to handle disputes. Such reforms are expected to make consumer legal protection more effective and to ensure legal certainty, justice, and balance among parties involved in the trade of goods and services in Indonesia.
Implementasi PERMA Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 tentang Dispensasi Kawin dan Implikasinya terhadap Perlindungan Hak Anak Hasan Yafiie; Fitriyah Fitriyah; Ainur Gufron
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i1.2416

Abstract

This study examines the regulation and implementation of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 5 of 2019 on Guidelines for Adjudicating Marriage Dispensation Requests and its implications for child rights protection in Indonesian marriage law. Employing a normative juridical approach with statutory and conceptual analysis, the study reviews Law No. 16 of 2019, PERMA 5/2019, and Law No. 35 of 2014 through library research and descriptive-analytical methods. The findings indicate that PERMA 5/2019 provides comprehensive guidelines for judges through the best interests of the child principle, including age verification, child-friendly examinations, and expert involvement to assess health, education, psychological, and family economic aspects. Its implementation shifts the judicial paradigm toward child-centered justice. However, challenges such as socio-cultural pressures, variations in judicial competence, and limited access to experts lead to inconsistent decisions that potentially perpetuate child marriage. Key implications include strengthening children's rights to participation, education, and development, yet field practices show dispensations often rely on emergency reasons like premarital pregnancy without long-term considerations. The study recommends enhancing judicial capacity, institutional synergy, digital monitoring, and regulatory revisions to position dispensation as a limited exception, effectively preventing early marriage.