Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Teologi Pambelum
Novallick Justin Sundamen Elungan
Fakultas Teologi, Universitas Kristen Indonesia Tomohon
Religion

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Distingsi Pencipta-Ciptaan dalam Pemikiran Cornelius Van Til sebagai Kritik Apologetis Terhadap Dataisme Novallick Justin Sundamen Elungan; Henny William Booth Sumakul
Jurnal Teologi Pambelum Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Teologi dalam Dialog dengan Budaya, Teknologi, dan Kerentanan Manusia
Publisher : Unit Penerbitan Informasi dan Teknologi Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Gereja Kalimantan Evangelis (STT GKE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59002/jtp.v6i1.221

Abstract

Dataism, as popularized by Yuval Noah Harari, views all of reality - including human beings - as a data-processing system, thereby elevating the flow of data to the highest value that determines meaning, decisions, and truth, and thus emerges as an alternative religion in the contemporary era. This article examines the ontological and epistemological claims of Dataism through the framework of Cornelius Van Til’s Creator-creation distinction. This study employs a qualitative-descriptive literature review design with thematic text analysis, mapping Dataism into four hierarchical layers of claims: empirical (the capacity of algorithms to process data), anthropological (the reduction of humans to biochemical algorithms), epistemological (data as the authority of knowledge), and axiological (the flow of data as the highest value). The results show that Van Til’s distinction affirms the empirical reliability of algorithms but reveals a fundamental error in the subsequent three layers, as Dataism repeats an ancient rebellion—namely, the creation’s desire to usurp the Creator’s throne, now with data as its crown. This study concludes that the Creator-creation distinction serves as a powerful yet focused presuppositional critique, affirming the status of data as a derivative and dependent creation, not an absolute source of truth.
Co-Authors Henny William Booth Sumakul