Mamatova Marhabo Adxamovna, Siddiqova Kibriyo Tursunboyevna, Rasulova Nodira To‘lqinjonovna
Uzbek Language and Literature Teacher, Specialized School of Izboskan District

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

PEDAGOGICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF TEACHING WORLD LITERATURE IN SPECIALIZED SCHOOLS AND ITS PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT ON STUDENTS Mamatova Marhabo Adxamovna, Siddiqova Kibriyo Tursunboyevna, Rasulova Nodira To‘lqinjonovna
International Journal of Literature and Language Studies Vol. 5 No. 08 (2026): International Journal of Literature and Language Studies
Publisher : International Journal of Literature and Language Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article analyzes the pedagogical and methodological foundations of teaching works of world literature in specialized schools and examines their possible psychological effects on students. World literature education is considered not merely as the presentation of foreign authors and literary works, but as an educational process that enables students to encounter different historical, social, and cultural experiences through literary texts. Drawing on Uzbek methodological literature and international research, the study discusses contextual, dialogic, problem-based, comparative, and reflective approaches to literary teaching. Particular attention is paid to the need to analyze world literature not only through plot and character systems, but also through historical and cultural context, authorial perspective, moral choices, multiple viewpoints, and students’ own interpretations. Existing empirical research on the psychological dimensions of literary reading is critically examined. The article recognizes evidence suggesting that literary reading and dialogic engagement with fiction may support perspective-taking, reflection, and understanding of other people’s mental states, while emphasizing that such effects should not be interpreted as automatic or universal outcomes of reading literature. The study is theoretical and methodological in nature and does not present experimental or statistical results that were not actually obtained by the authors.