Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Bagus Putra Handika Pradana
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Antinomi Norma dan Implikasi Yuridis Rekomendasi Rapat Dengar Pendapat Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat terhadap Penegakan Hukum Yuniar Riza Hakiki; Rahmadiana Bella Mahmuda; Aulia Rachman Eka Putra; Bagus Putra Handika Pradana
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 4 JULI 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The oversight function of Commission III of the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI) often clashes with the principle of law enforcement independence. This study aims to restructure the parliamentary oversight function to enhance the independence of law enforcement agencies guaranteed by the Constitution. The research method is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results indicate significant antinomy between the MD3 Law and the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the Prosecutor Law, and the Police Law, leading to legislative overreach. Although Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-XV/2017 legitimizes political oversight, the absence of material boundaries in Hearings (RDP) often triggers undue influence on case technicalities, violating the principle of due process of law. A reconstruction of norms through the revision of the MD3 Law is required to emphasize the demarcation between policy oversight and case oversight. This reconstruction includes implementing the principle of "exhaustion of remedies," tiered confidentiality, and redefining RDP recommendations as non-executory administrative-instructional "constitutional notifications" to ensure a balance between public accountability and judicial independence.
Co-Authors Aulia Rachman Eka Putra Rahmadiana Bella Mahmuda Yuniar Riza Hakiki