Moch. Ivan Fadhila
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Implikasi Populisme Kerja Pengawasan DPR terhadap Due Proses of Law dan Indepedensi Lembaga Peradilan Rizki Mubarok; Moch. Ivan Fadhila; Saiful Fakhri Fadhila
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 4 JULI 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research analyzes the phenomenon of legislative populism within the supervisory function of the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI), which increasingly tends to intervene in the judicial sphere. Following the enactment of the National Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023) and the Criminal Procedure Code (Law No. 20 of 2025), a trend has emerged where Commission III of the DPR RI acts reactively toward viral legal cases on social media, such as the cases of Andrie Yunus, Amsal Sitepu, and Fandi Ramadhan. This normative legal research employs statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to dissect the demarcation line between political oversight and judicial intervention. The findings indicate that populist and casuistic supervisory practices implicate the erosion of the due process of law principle and create a "chilling effect" on judicial independence. The DPR often exceeds its authority (ultra vires) by providing specific instructions regarding sub-judice cases. This study recommends a reconstruction of the DPR's supervisory model toward a structural-systemic approach by strengthening "Sub Iudice Rule" protocols within the MD3 Law, ensuring that the system of checks and balances functions without compromising the supremacy of law.