Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Priviet Social Sciences Journal
Arrohmah Qurniawati Husna Putri
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Asahan
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Asset turnover and firm value in Indonesian telecommunications: Panel evidence and robustness tests in 2021-2024 Arrohmah Qurniawati Husna Putri; Nisfu Fhitri
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 8 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i8.2169

Abstract

This study re-examines the association between total asset turnover and firm value in Indonesian telecommunications after accounting for the panel structure, business-model heterogeneity, leverage, outliers, and temporal ordering. The revision replaces the complete-case design with an unbalanced panel covering 20 of the 22 firms in the Indonesian telecommunications population. The primary Price-to-Book Value (PBV) panel contains 72 firm-year observations for 2021-2024; firm-years with non-positive book equity are omitted only where PBV is not economically interpretable. Pooled OLS with year and business-category effects, firm fixed effects, random effects, and a Mundlak correlated-random-effects specification are compared. HC3 inference, a firm-block bootstrap, winsorisation, lagged ratios, leave-one-firm-out tests, and alternative profitability and valuation measures are reported. The first-submission negative turnover coefficient is not robust across PBV panel specifications: the pooled HC3 estimate is b = -0.101 (p = .879), while fixed- and random-effects estimates are also imprecise. A negative association is stronger for enterprise-value-to-sales, but this does not establish that low turnover is a growth signal. The revised conclusion is therefore limited to specification-dependent conditional associations rather than causal market preferences or investment returns.
Co-Authors Nisfu Fhitri