Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas LEMBARAN PUBLIKASI MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI (LPMGB)
Erik Indra Putra
PT. Pertamina Hulu Rokan
Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Energy

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Evaluasi Kesesuaian Demulsifier Y sebagai Pengganti Demulsifier X pada Crude Oil Lapangan Minas Berdasarkan Water Separation dan Basic Sediment and Water (BS&W) Samsinar Sri Ningsih; Maulana Hardi; Tyas Kuswardani; Erik Indra Putra
Lembaran publikasi minyak dan gas bumi Vol 60 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : BBPMGB LEMIGAS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29017/LPMGB.60.2.2159

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi kecocokan penggantian Demulsifier X dengan Demulsifier Y pada crude oil Lapangan Minas melalui pengujian water separation dan Basic Sediment and Water (BS&W). Pengujian dilakukan menggunakan metode bottle test pada suhu 79,4°C (175°F) dengan variasi konsentrasi 0, 50, dan 100 ppm. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa seluruh perlakuan demulsifier menghasilkan kualitas antarmuka Loose Rag (LR), sedangkan sampel blank menunjukkan Tight Rag (TR). Pada konsentrasi 100 ppm, Demulsifier Y menghasilkan water separation sebesar 80%, lebih tinggi dibandingkan Demulsifier X sebesar 76%. Analisis BS&W menunjukkan bahwa Demulsifier X, Y, dan campuran Demulsifier X–Y menghasilkan nilai BS&W 0,0%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Demulsifier Y mampu memberikan kinerja pemisahan yang setara bahkan lebih baik dibandingkan Demulsifier X serta jika terjadi pencampuran dengan Demulsifier X tidak menurunkan efektivitas pemisahan minyak dan air. Dengan demikian, Demulsifier Y layak digunakan sebagai pengganti Demulsifier X pada Lapangan Minas.
Mitigating Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in Produced Water: Performance of MB-X Biocide Assessed by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Biological Activity Reaction Test at Regional 1 Sumatera Erik Indra Putra; Maulana Hardi; Oktaviani Kusuma Wardani
Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas Vol 49 No 3 (2026)
Publisher : Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29017/scog.v49i3.2068

Abstract

Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are major drivers of microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) and reservoir souring in waterflooding operations, particularly in mature onshore assets with high produced-water volumes. This is showing the need for effective control of SRB to mitigate potential risks and maintain the integrity of waterflooding operations. Therefore, this study is aiming to evaluate the efficacy of the biocide MB-X at multiple doses (50-200 ppm) in suppressing SRB activity and population using the SRB-BART (Biological Activity Reaction Test). The experiment is being conducted by collecting produced-water samples from the Outlet WT at Field MX, followed by daily monitoring of SRB activity to determine the reaction day. The data obtained are being converted into population estimates (CFU/mL) according to the commercial kit guidance: Day-3 = 1.15 × 10⁵ CFU/mL; Day-4 = 2.7 × 10⁴ CFU/mL; Day-10 = 5 CFU/mL; Day-11 < 1 CFU/mL. Aggressiveness is being classified according to the kit scoring, namely Aggressive, Not Aggressive, and Negative. The results are showing that the control (blank) is showing a BB-type SRB consortium (anaerobe-dominant), with 1.15 × 10⁵ CFU/mL being classified as Aggressive. MB-X 50 ppm is reducing the population to 2.7 × 10⁴ CFU/mL, but the response is remaining Aggressive. In comparison, MB-X 100 ppm is suppressing counts to 5 CFU/mL (Not Aggressive), while MB-X 200 ppm is yielding a Negative response, showing undetected SRB activity. These results are indicating that MB-X at ≥100 ppm is effectively controlling SRB under test conditions, with 200 ppm achieving apparent eradication as detected by SRB-BART. However, interpretation of the statistical outcomes is being constrained by the limited number of treatment replicates, suggesting that the results should be considered a preliminary site-specific evaluation of MB-X performance. Consequently, future studies are being recommended to conduct field verification through replication, matrix controls, and in-situ corrosion monitoring to confirm performance durability.
Co-Authors Maulana Hardi Oktaviani Kusuma Wardani Samsinar Sri Ningsih Tyas Kuswardani