This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Gaussian
Fajar Dwi Cahyoko
Demography and Civil Registration Study Program, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Kampus Tirtomoyo, Jalan Kolonel Sutarto 150 K, Jebres, Surakarta – Indonesia

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

ANALISIS AUTOKORELASI SPASIAL DAN STATISTIK GETIS-ORD GI* TERHADAP DISTRIBUSI PERSENTASE PENDUDUK MISKIN DI PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH Fajar Dwi Cahyoko; Nanda Oktarina Aditya; Muhammad Riefky
Jurnal Gaussian Vol 15, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Gaussian
Publisher : Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/j.gauss.15.2.344-355

Abstract

Central Java Province is one of the provinces with a higher percentage of poor population compared to the national average. Although the poverty rate has declined in recent years, poverty issues in Central Java still require comprehensive solutions, particularly through evidence-based, area-based policy formulation. This study aims to identify the existence of spatial dependence in the percentage of poor population in Central Java Province, to map local poverty clusters, and to detect statistically significant concentrations of high and low poverty values in order to reveal structural poverty pockets. Global spatial autocorrelation testing using Moran's I yielded a value of 0.181 (Z = 1.802; p = 0.036), indicating a statistically significant clustered spatial pattern in the percentage of poor population across regencies/cities. Local spatial autocorrelation analysis (LISA) further identified three types of local association patterns at the 10% significance level: High–High, Low–High, and High–Low. Complementing these local patterns, hotspot and coldspot analysis using the Getis–Ord statistic—which captures the concentration of high or low values within a neighborhood rather than deviation-based association—identified seven regencies as statistically significant hotspots (one at the 99%, three at the 95%, and three at the 90% confidence level) and one regency as a significant coldspot (95% confidence level). This dual approach enables a more specific and operational identification of priority regions for poverty reduction policy.