Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Komang Mas Bayu Puspayoga
Unknown Affiliation
Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Mekanisme Peradilan Koneksitas dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Komang Mas Bayu Puspayoga
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Agustus : Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v3i4.1894

Abstract

 The connectivity judicial mechanism is an essential instrument in unifying two distinct judicial systems to avoid jurisdictional conflicts and disparities in court decisions. This study aims to analyze the legal basis of the connectivity judiciary within the Indonesian criminal justice system, harmonize regulatory inconsistencies between the general and military judiciaries, and critically review its implementation in the acid attack case against human rights activist Andrie Yunus. The research method employed is normative legal research utilizing the statute, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of the analysis indicate that Articles 170–172 of Law Number 20 Year 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code provide a renewed affirmation of the resolution of connectivity cases as a legitimate deviation from absolute competence for the sake of effective law enforcement. Following the Pre-Trial Decision Number 62/Pid.Pra/2026/PN JKT.SEL, the opportunity to apply the connectivity judiciary to the Andrie Yunus case is wide open, given the indications of intellectual actors from civilian circles working alongside members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces. Although its implementation on the ground still faces practical hurdles such as subjectivity in determining the gravitational center of loss, potential sector-ego, and a very strict time limit for joint investigation reports of a maximum of 7 days, these challenges are balanced by the policy of a balanced composition of the joint panel of judges under Article 172 to guarantee independence. This study concludes that the connectivity judiciary is a tangible manifestation of the due process of law principle that integrates judicial jurisdictions to achieve justice without compromising legal certainty.
Co-Authors