Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Current Studies in SDGs Journal of Current Studies in SDGs
Alif Firdaus Zamzam
State University of Surabaya
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Toward a Social Capital Model of School Conflict Management: Aligning Institutional Governance with SDG 16 Alif Firdaus Zamzam; Yatim Riyanto; Muhamad Sholeh
Journal of Current Studies in SDGs Vol. 3 No. 4 (2027): December
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sabilul Muttaqin Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63230/jocsis.3.4.321

Abstract

Objective: To synthesize organizational conflict theory, social capital theory, and school-specific empirical findings into a conceptual framework for managing conflict within school organizations, and to map how the classical stages of the conflict process can ideally be applied within schools to convert rivalry into healthy competition rather than destructive dispute-with explicit attention to how such a framework supports quality, and strong, accountable institutions (SDG 16). Method: The study employs a narrative literature review drawing on the classical theoretical corpus of management, organizational conflict, and social capital theory, enriched with supplementary 2015–2026 literature from international and national academic databases, including studies conducted specifically within school settings. Results: The review shows that conflict in school organizations differs from conflict in other organizations in its heterogeneous set of stakeholders, its dual bureaucratic-professional authority structure, and its embeddedness in public accountability. Social capital — comprising trust, networks, and norms of reciprocity — is shown to mediate both the prevention and the constructive channeling of conflict, including within schools. Novelty: The review further reveals that Indonesia's high power distance and collectivist culture add a distinct risk of false harmony. Building on this synthesis, the article offers a novel success-failure formula (the Success Potential of Conflict Management, SPCM) and a staged framework for applying conflict management ideally within school organizations a synthesis that has not previously combined social capital theory with the conflict-process stages within the specific institutional and cultural context of Indonesian schools.
Engineering Conflict for Organizational Innovation through Social Capital and Relational Structure in Hybrid School Governance for Advancing SDG 16 Alif Firdaus Zamzam; Yatim Riyanto; Muhamad Sholeh
Journal of Current Studies in SDGs Vol. 3 No. 4 (2027): December
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sabilul Muttaqin Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63230/jocsis.3.4.327

Abstract

Objective: To examine conflict engineering as a proactive organizational practice that deliberately structures naturally occurring tensions into a repeatable cycle of organizational learning and innovation, rather than merely resolving conflict after it emerges. Method: Using a qualitative multi-site case study, the research investigates governance practices in two hybrid schools combining academic and residential functions in Lamongan Regency, Indonesia. Data were collected from 34 purposively selected informants through semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and document analysis, and were analyzed using within-case coding and cross-case synthesis. Result: The findings reveal that conflict engineering operates through six interconnected stages: detection, diagnosis, intervention design, facilitation, evaluation, and learning. Social capital, manifested in trust, shared norms, and informal networks, enables organizational actors to channel tension into constructive competition and collaborative problem-solving. The findings further identify relational structure as a provisional boundary condition: horizontal conflicts among peers were more amenable to engineering and were associated with organizational innovation, whereas vertical conflicts tended to encourage avoidance under conditions of high power distance. Novelty: The study’s novelty lies in conceptualizing conflict engineering as a cyclical governance mechanism enabled by social capital and conditioned by relational structure, while repositioning the classical POAC functions (Planning, Organizing, Actuating, and Controlling) as its operational mechanism rather than its theoretical foundation. The study thus extends conflict management from reactive resolution toward deliberate organizational learning and innovation.
Toward a Social Capital Model of School Conflict Management: Aligning Institutional Governance with SDG 16 Alif Firdaus Zamzam; Yatim Riyanto; Muhamad Sholeh
Journal of Current Studies in SDGs Vol. 3 No. 4 (2027): December
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sabilul Muttaqin Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63230/jocsis.3.4.321

Abstract

Objective: To synthesize organizational conflict theory, social capital theory, and school-specific empirical findings into a conceptual framework for managing conflict within school organizations, and to map how the classical stages of the conflict process can ideally be applied within schools to convert rivalry into healthy competition rather than destructive dispute-with explicit attention to how such a framework supports quality, and strong, accountable institutions (SDG 16). Method: The study employs a narrative literature review drawing on the classical theoretical corpus of management, organizational conflict, and social capital theory, enriched with supplementary 2015–2026 literature from international and national academic databases, including studies conducted specifically within school settings. Results: The review shows that conflict in school organizations differs from conflict in other organizations in its heterogeneous set of stakeholders, its dual bureaucratic-professional authority structure, and its embeddedness in public accountability. Social capital — comprising trust, networks, and norms of reciprocity — is shown to mediate both the prevention and the constructive channeling of conflict, including within schools. Novelty: The review further reveals that Indonesia's high power distance and collectivist culture add a distinct risk of false harmony. Building on this synthesis, the article offers a novel success-failure formula (the Success Potential of Conflict Management, SPCM) and a staged framework for applying conflict management ideally within school organizations a synthesis that has not previously combined social capital theory with the conflict-process stages within the specific institutional and cultural context of Indonesian schools.
Engineering Conflict for Organizational Innovation through Social Capital and Relational Structure in Hybrid School Governance for Advancing SDG 16 Alif Firdaus Zamzam; Yatim Riyanto; Muhamad Sholeh
Journal of Current Studies in SDGs Vol. 3 No. 4 (2027): December
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sabilul Muttaqin Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63230/jocsis.3.4.327

Abstract

Objective: To examine conflict engineering as a proactive organizational practice that deliberately structures naturally occurring tensions into a repeatable cycle of organizational learning and innovation, rather than merely resolving conflict after it emerges. Method: Using a qualitative multi-site case study, the research investigates governance practices in two hybrid schools combining academic and residential functions in Lamongan Regency, Indonesia. Data were collected from 34 purposively selected informants through semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and document analysis, and were analyzed using within-case coding and cross-case synthesis. Result: The findings reveal that conflict engineering operates through six interconnected stages: detection, diagnosis, intervention design, facilitation, evaluation, and learning. Social capital, manifested in trust, shared norms, and informal networks, enables organizational actors to channel tension into constructive competition and collaborative problem-solving. The findings further identify relational structure as a provisional boundary condition: horizontal conflicts among peers were more amenable to engineering and were associated with organizational innovation, whereas vertical conflicts tended to encourage avoidance under conditions of high power distance. Novelty: The study’s novelty lies in conceptualizing conflict engineering as a cyclical governance mechanism enabled by social capital and conditioned by relational structure, while repositioning the classical POAC functions (Planning, Organizing, Actuating, and Controlling) as its operational mechanism rather than its theoretical foundation. The study thus extends conflict management from reactive resolution toward deliberate organizational learning and innovation.
Co-Authors Muhamad Sholeh Yatim Riyanto