Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner
Muhamad Agung Setiawan
Agung Putra University
Religion Humanities Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Harmony in Diversity: Gus Dur's Pluralism Concept in Development Communication for Interfaith Unity in Indonesia Muhamad Agung Setiawan; Lakna Tulas'un
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 3 Agustus 2026: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jipsi.v5i3.1499

Abstract

Indonesia’s religious diversity is an important social asset for national development, yet persistent religious intolerance and interfaith conflict continue to challenge religious harmony. Previous studies have examined development communication and Gus Dur’s pluralism separately, particularly in relation to religious tolerance, social diversity, and human rights. However, limited research has integrated Gus Dur’s pluralistic thought into development communication for fostering interfaith harmony in Indonesia. This study aims to explore the manifestation of Gus Dur’s pluralism through development communication for interfaith unity. Using a qualitative approach and library research design, the study analyzes primary sources from Gus Dur’s works, including My Islam, Your Islam, Our Islam, God Does Not Need to Be Defended, and Gus Dur Speaks, supported by relevant books and journal articles. Data were collected through systematic reading and documentation, then organized, categorized, and analyzed descriptively to identify recurring concepts. The findings reveal three main pillars: interfaith dialogue, advocacy for tolerance-oriented policies, and conflict prevention and resolution. These pillars position religious leaders as development communicators who translate pluralistic values into practical efforts to promote mutual understanding, protect minority rights, and strengthen social cohesion. The novelty lies in integrating Gus Dur’s pluralism with development communication as a practical framework for fostering interfaith harmony in Indonesia.
Framing Analysis of Priority Policy for PPPK 3T Teachers to Become Civil Servants in Indonesian Online Media: (Study on CNN Indonesia, ANTARA and Okezone Online Media) Lakna Tulas'un; Muhamad Agung Setiawan; Isti Winarni
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 3 Agustus 2026: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jipsi.v5i3.1650

Abstract

Online media plays a strategic role in shaping public interpretation of policies through different framing practices in each media. This study aims to analyze how CNN Indonesia, ANTARA, and Okezone frame the news regarding the priority policy of appointing Government Employees with Employment Agreements (PPPK) teachers in the frontier, outermost, and disadvantaged (3T) regions to become Civil Servants (PNS) and identify differences in the construction of meaning produced by each media. This study uses a qualitative approach with Robert N. Entman's framing analysis method through four analysis tools, namely define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgment and treatment recommendation. The research data is in the form of three news articles published on August 20, 2026 by CNN Indonesia, ANTARA, and Okezone, which were collected through documentation techniques and analyzed interpretively. The results of the study show that CNN Indonesia builds institution-centered framing by placing Commission X of the House of Representatives as the main source of policy legitimacy. ANTARA develops governance-centered framing through an emphasis on the government's responsibility in realizing equitable distribution of education in the 3T region. Meanwhile, Okezone presents human-centered framing by focusing the narrative on the expectations and opportunities of PPPK teachers as policy beneficiaries. This study confirms that framing differences not only affect the way the public understands affirmative policy, but also represent the symbolic relationship between central and peripheral regions in the discourse of educational justice in Indonesia, thus enriching the study of digital journalism, public policy communication, and intercultural communication.
Co-Authors Isti Winarni Lakna Tulas'un Lakna Tulas'un