Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan
Setiawati Setiawati
Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Implikasi Hukum Terhadap Artificial dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia Karmila Karmila; Setiawati Setiawati
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Vol 3 No 1 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/kihan.v3i1.4683

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the legal impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Indonesian justice system, focusing on regulations, legal responsibilities, and the ethical and justice-related aspects of its application. Methodology/approach: The research adopts a normative legal method through literature review, examining legislation, Supreme Court policies (such as Smart Assembly and e-Court), legal journals, and relevant news from 2023 to 2025. The focus is on how AI is implemented in the Indonesian judiciary, particularly concerning regulation, ethics, and accountability. Results/findings: The study finds that AI enhances the speed, efficiency, and transparency of judicial processes. Tools like Smart Assembly help objectively assign judges to cases. However, the absence of specific regulations creates ambiguity in assigning legal responsibility for AI-related errors. Additionally, without strict oversight, AI may cause bias, injustice, or human rights violations due to skewed or incomplete training data. Conclusions: AI contributes positively to efficiency and objectivity in Indonesia’s justice system but cannot replace human moral and ethical reasoning. It should be used as a support tool, with final decisions remaining in human hands. This requires adaptive legal frameworks, ongoing supervision, and the application of the human-in-the-loop principle. Limitations: The study is limited to normative analysis and literature review without empirical research or field interviews. It does not assess AI implementation comprehensively across Indonesia. Contribution: This study offers input for regulators in drafting AI-related legal policies and supports the Supreme Court in developing fair AI systems. It also contributes to academic discourse in law, ethics, information technology, and public policy.
Baduy Legal Culture in Customary Inheritance Dispute Resolution Based on Pancasila Citizenship Values Setiawati Setiawati; Yayuk Muji Rahayu; Suyato Suyato; Nur Khamdah
Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Vol 5, No 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Keluarga Guru Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46843/jpm.v5i3.876

Abstract

The Baduy indigenous community maintains a traditional inheritance legal system that continues to function effectively amid legal pluralism and social change in Indonesia. However, studies linking the resolution of traditional inheritance disputes to the civic values of Pancasila remain limited. This study aims to analyze the Baduy community’s legal culture in resolving traditional inheritance disputes and to examine the manifestations of Pancasila’s civic values embedded within it. The research employs a qualitative case study method conducted in Kanekes Village, Lebak Regency, Banten Province. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, documentation, and literature review, involving the Head of Kanekes Village (Jaro Pamarentah), traditional leaders, and members of the Baduy community selected through purposive sampling. Data analysis was conducted using the Grounded Theory technique through the stages of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The research findings indicate that inheritance distribution is based on a process that involves the stages of open, axial family deliberation, mutual agreement, and consideration of the heirs’ needs and responsibilities. Disputes are resolved through non-litigation mechanisms involving traditional leaders and the Jaro as mediators to restore family harmony. These practices reflect the civic values of Pancasila, particularly deliberation to reach consensus, social justice, social responsibility, and harmony. This research contributes to the development of studies on legal culture, customary law, and Pancasila and Citizenship Education by demonstrating the relevance of local wisdom in building a peaceful, just, community-based model of dispute resolution.
Co-Authors Karmila Karmila Nur Khamdah Suyato Suyato Yayuk Muji Rahayu