Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ius Comparatum: Journal of Law Studies
Maulvina Shanti Leavinita
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
The State Sovereignty in Banned Entry Policy: A Comparative Study of the Indonesian and British Immigration Systems Muhammad Hanif Arkan; Maulvina Shanti Leavinita; Avishtya Siti Karaniya
Journal of Ius Comparatum Law Studies Vol 2 No 2 (2026): May-August (State Sovereignty, Membership, and Mobility: Comparative Perspectives
Publisher : Faculty of Law |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/icjls.v2i2.14823

Abstract

The debate over absolute state sovereignty and the cross-border protection of human rights forms the basis of modern immigration law dynamics. This study analyses state sovereignty in entry-ban policies and compares the immigration legal systems of Indonesia and the United Kingdom. The main issue examined is Indonesia’s executive discretion in entry-ban decisions, which remains weakly accountable, while the UK system links discretion to judicial oversight. The research uses normative legal research through statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings show that although both countries apply the jus exclusionis principle, the UK has a more institutionalised oversight mechanism through the First-tier Tribunal to assess public good parameters, whereas Indonesia still relies on broad ministerial authority without a public transparency obligation. This research's novelty lies in its cross-system comparison between civil law and common law, exploring the “grey area” of immigration discretion that earlier studies have not sufficiently discussed. In conclusion, Indonesia needs to renew its immigration law by adopting the due process of law principle to address transparency challenges without weakening national sovereignty. This study presents all parts, from the theoretical basis to the reform recommendations, comprehensively.
Co-Authors Avishtya Siti Karaniya Muhammad Hanif Arkan