Harmono Harmono
Swadaya Gunung Jati University

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CRIME OF TRAFFICKING DANGEROUS COSMETICS WITHOUT A DISTRIBUTION PERMIT IN DECISION NUMBER 54/Pid.Sus/2026/PN Cbn Shafa Aura Nabilla; Diana Agustina; Khodijah Sefty Amelia; Ivan Pamungkas; Harmono Harmono
Jurnal Abdisci Vol 3 No 8 (2026): Vol 3 No 8 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/abdisci.v3i8.1300

Abstract

Background. The distribution of cosmetics that fail to meet safety and quality standards constitutes a legal issue that may endanger consumers. This issue is reflected in Decision Number 54/Pid.Sus/2026/PN Cbn concerning the distribution of pharmaceutical preparations in the form of cosmetics that failed to meet safety, efficacy, and quality requirements and lacked proper distribution authorization. Aims. This study aims to analyze the application of criminal law provisions to the distribution of hazardous cosmetics and examine the legal considerations of the panel of judges in rendering the decision. Methods. This study employs a normative juridical method using a statutory approach and a case approach, with the primary legal material consisting of Decision Number 54/Pid.Sus/2026/PN Cbn and relevant statutory provisions. Result. The results indicate that the defendant's actions fulfilled all elements of Article 435 of Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health in conjunction with Appendix I Number 181 of Law Number 1 of 2026 concerning Criminal Adjustment. Laboratory examination established that several cosmetic products contained hazardous substances, namely mercury and hydroquinone. The panel of judges considered the defendant's culpability, personal circumstances, and principles of justice in determining the type and amount of punishment. Conslusion. In conclusion, the defendant was legally and convincingly proven guilty of distributing pharmaceutical preparations that failed to meet standards, safety requirements, and quality requirements and was sentenced to a fine of IDR 120,000,000.00.
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF E-COURT AS A FORM OF MODERN JUSTICE: AN EMPIRICAL JURIDICAL STUDY IN THE RELIGIOUS COURT OF CIREBON CITY Siti Khoerunnisa; M Rafi Adli Atallah; Krisna Putra Narotama; Harmono Harmono
Jurnal Abdisci Vol 3 No 8 (2026): Vol 3 No 8 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/abdisci.v3i8.1301

Abstract

Background. The implementation of the electronic court (e-Court) system within the Religious Court environment represents a form of digital transformation aimed at realizing a modern, fast, simple, and low-cost judiciary as mandated by the Supreme Court through PERMA No. 7 of 2022. In practice, however, implementing e-Court at the Cirebon City Religious Court still faces various obstacles, ranging from infrastructure readiness and staff digital competence to the technological literacy of justice seekers, resulting in a gap between normative objectives and implementation realities. Aims. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of e-Court implementation at the Cirebon City Religious Court as a form of modern judiciary, and to identify the supporting and inhibiting factors involved. Methods. This study employs an empirical juridical method with a descriptive qualitative approach, using interviews with judges, court clerks, and e-Court users, direct observation during the Field Judicial Practice (PPL), and document study of relevant regulations. Result. The results show that e-Court implementation at the Cirebon City Religious Court has generally run effectively in accelerating case administration, although technical obstacles such as system disruptions and limited digital understanding among some justice seekers remain. Conclusion. The study concludes that the effectiveness of e-Court needs to be supported by increased socialization, technical assistance, and stronger digital infrastructure to optimally achieve the goal of a modern judiciary.
EMPIRICAL JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DOMINANT FACTORS REFERRING TO HUSBAND SPOUSES' WIFE ON ANNULMENT OF DIVORCE LAWSUIT (IN THE CITY RELIGIOUS COURT CIREBON) Rahmah Khosaroh; Mochamad Rafif Naufal; Asep Subagja; Harmono Harmono
Jurnal Abdisci Vol 3 No 8 (2026): Vol 3 No 8 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/abdisci.v3i8.1302

Abstract

Background. Divorce is one of the most often filed cases in the Religious Court, but not all divorce lawsuit cases end in a divorce decision, because the procedural law of the religious court provides space for the parties to reconcile and refer before the decision has permanent legal force, so that the case is revoked or canceled. This phenomenon was found during the implementation of the Field Experience Practice at the Cirebon City Religious Court, where a number of divorce lawsuit cases ended in cancellation due to referral, both at the mediation stage and during the case examination. Aims. This study aims to analyze the dominant factors that encourage married couples to make a referral so that the divorce lawsuit case is canceled, as well as analyze its juridical implications on the status and continuation of the case process. Methods. This study uses an empirical juridical method with a descriptive qualitative approach, through document studies of case archives, interviews with judges, mediators, clerks, and litigants, and direct observation at the Cirebon City Religious Court. Data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model of qualitative analysis. Result. The results of the study showed that the dominant factors causing referrals included consideration of children's interests, family intervention, economic factors, and legal and religious awareness to maintain the integrity of the household. Juridically, the referrals that occurred during the trial caused the loss of the plaintiff's legal interests, so the judge determined the revocation or cancellation of the case. Conclusion. This study concluded that strengthening the mediation function in the Religious Court is important as a preventive effort to encourage reconciliation between married couples before the case is decided.