Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies
Apipudin Apipudin
Universitas Syeikh Nawawi Banten, Indonesia

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Effectiveness of Monetary Zakat Fitrah: Wahbah Az-Zuhaili and Imam Abu Hanifa's Perspectives Apipudin Apipudin; Khodijah Tul Kubro; Irma Maunatuz Zahro; Nur Asiah
Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies (SSharia)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/ssharia.v1i3.87

Abstract

The digitalization of Zakat Fitrah clashes with textual orthodoxy requiring physical commodities, creating methodological tension between rational istihsan and textual ihtiyat. This doctrinal study utilized comparative jurisprudence alongside contextual verification to critically evaluate the effectiveness of monetary payments according to Abu Hanifa and Wahbah Zuhaili. The research demonstrated that neither paradigm suffices independently within modern philanthropy. Rational istihsan legally validates the operational acceleration of digital financial platforms, while strict textualism provides vital macroeconomic protection by rigorously pegging fiat currency to real food indices, preventing depreciation caused by severe inflation. Consequently, this article formulates a novel hybrid Shariah governance model. Integrating these two epistemologies establishes a robust global blueprint for Islamic social finance. This moderate synthesis successfully balances technological distribution efficiency with the absolute preservation of fundamental economic rights of beneficiaries. Ultimately, this framework safeguards the core objectives of Islamic law concerning equitable wealth distribution across all modern digital economic systems.
Analysis of Waqf Land Withdrawal: Sharia Economic Law and Indonesian Positive Law Apipudin Apipudin; Asruni Asruni; Tatik Winarsih; Muhammad Zainul Rohman
Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies (SSharia)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/ssharia.v1i3.88

Abstract

The exploitation of oral waqf endowments by heirs demanding property retrieval highlights a critical socio-legal tension between Islamic living law and state administrative formalization. This normative-doctrinal study integrated socio-legal and comparative Islamic jurisprudence approaches to systematically investigate the waqf dispute at Masjid Nurul Huda, Indonesia. We analyzed statutory regulations and classical texts using the tahqiq al-manath framework. The findings proved that the absence of a Waqf Pledge Deed constitutes merely a procedural anomaly, completely failing to invalidate substantive endowments. Across four major schools of Islamic jurisprudence and Law Number 41 of 2004, the retrieval of mosque land remains absolutely prohibited because legitimate ownership has eternally transitioned from the initial endower. This study demonstrates that prioritizing administrative rigidity over substantive validity fundamentally threatens global Islamic philanthropy. Consequently, resolving undocumented endowments necessitates the strategic hybridization of cultural mediation and formal judicial ratification to permanently safeguard maqashid al-syariah against pragmatic customary inheritance claims
Analysis of Dharibah Taxation Concept in Islamic Law Imam Abu Yusuf's Perspective Apipudin Apipudin; Mudawamah Sulis Laelah; Zahrotu Shita Azzahra
Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies (SSharia)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/ssharia.v1i3.89

Abstract

Contemporary Muslim majority nations confront structural tensions regarding the double burden trap between zakat and tax obligations alongside severe fiscal management disintegration. Filling previous literature blind spots, this normative doctrinal research operated a conceptual historical approach toward the Book of Alkharaj to deconstruct the epistemological framework of Imam Abu Yusuf. Jurisprudential analysis proves that he legitimizes taxes not merely as levies, but as obligatory instruments requiring absolute financial ratio flexibility. He radically deconstructs fixed rate systems into proportional harvest schemes, subsequently prohibiting authority privatization to eliminate social exploitation practices. Recontextualizing this classical fiscal constitutionalism presents a prescriptive doctrinal foundation for modern state authorities formulating progressive proportional legislation. Theoretical implications derived from these findings urge legislative unification through zakat integration as an official tax deduction instrument, ensuring structural tyranny is entirely prevented while financial justice becomes comprehensively realized across international public finance architecture to establish perfect modern state welfare governance stability.
Analysis of Cash Waqf from the Perspective of the Hanafi and Shafi’i Schools of Thought in Indonesia Apipudin Apipudin; Izla Amalia; Muhammad Fairuzi Amin; Yuliyah Yuliyah
Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies (SSharia)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/ssharia.v1i3.90

Abstract

Cash waqf management in Indonesia triggers epistemological tension between the physical asset preservation dogma of Shafiite jurisprudence and the commercial custom rationalization of Hanafite scholars. This dogmatic gap produces a massive fund stagnation anomaly due to theological hesitation among managers. This normative doctrinal research dismantled this deadlock through a comparative jurisprudential and teleological approach toward classical literature alongside national waqf legislation. The analytical results prove that the Indonesian positive legal architecture essentially created a novel methodological synthesis. These regulations adopt Shafiite principal value protection while simultaneously legitimizing Hanafite productive investment schemes through financial institutions. Nevertheless, this normative hybridization proves highly vulnerable to operating suboptimally in reality without proper risk mitigation infrastructure. This synthesis firmly asserts that philanthropic legal certainty absolutely demands the institutionalization of asset guarantee insurance instruments to accelerate economic justice. This constructive idea provides a revolutionary civilizational prototype for formulating global philanthropic epistemology within the modern international economy.
Analyzing Sharia P2P Lending Administrative Fees: POJK 10/2022 and Fatwa 117/DSN-MUI/II/2018 Perspectives Apipudin Apipudin; Atila Ananta Putri; Khiliza Zuratunnisa; Akhmad Kamal Khoiro
Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Smart: Journal of Islamic Religion and Sharia Studies (SSharia)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/ssharia.v1i3.91

Abstract

The transformation of digital funding ecosystems creates epistemological tension due to the absence of administrative fee caps. Positive law in POJK 10/2022 only mandates formal information transparency, clashing diametrically with Fatwa DSN-MUI 117/2018 which demands material justice. Addressing the analytical void of previous literature, this doctrinal research aimed to dissect this regulatory flaw. This qualitative study was conducted using the tahqiq al-manath method. The findings prove that procedural transparency instruments without maximum tariff parameters actually facilitate exploitative practices and fail to prevent tadlis violations, as evidenced empirically in the massive dispute case of PT Dana Syariah Indonesia. Administrative disclosure without substantive balance is a legal illusion that blatantly violates the hifzh al-mal protection principle. As a strategic implication, this study proposes an integrative governance reconstruction based on maqashid al-syari'ah. The author recommends adopting global Islamic financial civilization standards to recalibrate fee operationalization toward fair ujrah al-mitsl, preventing unjust wealth consumption.
Co-Authors Akhmad Kamal Khoiro Asruni Asruni Atila Ananta Putri Irma Maunatuz Zahro Izla Amalia Khiliza Zuratunnisa Khodijah Tul Kubro Mudawamah Sulis Laelah Muhammad Fairuzi Amin Muhammad Zainul Rohman Nur Asiah Tatik Winarsih Yuliyah Yuliyah Zahrotu Shita Azzahra