Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis
Hartiwiningsih
Sebelas Maret University

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Rehabilitative Sentencing for Narcotics Offenders in Surakarta District Court: A Humanistic Approach Aurel Nur Latifa; Hartiwiningsih; Sulistyanta
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/scrim.v1i2.47

Abstract

The handling of narcotics offenses in Indonesia faces a severe crisis due to the dominance of retributive reasoning, particularly in the Surakarta District Court. This doctrinal legal research aims to dissect the anomaly of subjective judicial considerations that disregard rehabilitation mandates for persons with pure drug dependency, while simultaneously formulating prescriptive legal parameters to limit such discretion. Utilizing statutory and case approaches, the analysis reveals that judges commit teleological judicial overreach. The medical authority of assessment institutions is marginalized by judicial ego and penal populism, which manipulate pretexts of public disturbance to imprison vulnerable end users. This malpractice dismantles restorative justice and exacerbates prison overcrowding. The study concludes that transforming into a humanistic judiciary necessitates three absolute restrictions: the obligation to hear independent medical opinions, establishing evidence thresholds as absolute presumptions for rehabilitation, and a total ban on subjective clauses to aggravate criminal sentences. These legal policies are crucial to restore human rights.
One Third Criminal Sentence Enhancement for Recidivists of Narcotics Crimes in Indonesia Erma Dwi Margareta; Hartiwiningsih; Sulistyanta
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/scrim.v1i2.48

Abstract

The transition in Indonesian criminal law triggers a sharp clash of norms between Article 144 of the Narcotics Act and the new National Penal Code. Special statutory provisions mandate a mechanical one third sentence enhancement for recidivists within a three year interval, whereas the newly enacted code extends this period to five years while prioritizing individualization of punishment. This doctrinal legal research examines the juridical implications of this normative dualism on judicial discretion and sentencing disparities. Empirically, rigid mathematical sentencing exacerbates extreme prison overcrowding and defies humanistic global trends in narcotics justice. This article argues that sentence enhancement must no longer operate through a purely mechanical approach for the sake of illusory certainty. Instead, judges should adopt a systematic teleological interpretation grounded in corrective justice. This study reconstructs ideal sentencing guidelines to harmonize statutory imperatives with judicial discretion, ensuring that narcotics recidivist sentences are strictly evaluated through medical rehabilitation eligibility.
Criminal Liability of Mining Corporations for Post-Mining Environmental Damage Aji Wahyu Maarif; Hartiwiningsih; Sulistyanta
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/scrim.v1i2.57

Abstract

Mining activities frequently cause massive post-mining environmental degradation, yet criminal law enforcement remains trapped within weak administrative formalities. This research analyzes corporate criminal liability and the relevance of applying the lex specialis derogat legi generali principle between the Mineral and Coal Mining Law and the Environmental Protection and Management Law. Utilizing normative juridical methods with conceptual and statutory approaches, this study reveals that ambiguous jurisdictional boundaries are frequently exploited by corporations as an impunity shield to evade substantive environmental offenses. The findings assert that the urgency of integrating ecological investigations and applying the lex consumens derogat legi consumptae principle is necessary to supersede partial lex specialis doctrines. This legal paradigm transformation is crucial to ensure that criminal enforcement transcends mere administrative compliance, aiming to guarantee ecological justice, functional environmental restoration, and the sustainability of constitutional rights for future generations of impacted communities due to current systemic corporate crimes in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Aji Wahyu Maarif Aurel Nur Latifa Erma Dwi Margareta Sulistyanta Sulistyanta