Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Asian Journal Science and Engineering Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Banyuwangi
Dwi Ratnaningsih
State Polytechnic of Malang
Humanities Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Mechanical Engineering Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Bimbingan Teknis Desain Kanopi Balai Pertemuan RT. 03 RW. 03 Bandulan Kota Malang Agustin Dita Lestari; Armin Naibaho; Dwi Ratnaningsih; Nain Dhaniarti Raharjo; Qomariah; Ratih Indri Hapsari
Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Banyuwangi (Jurnal Abdiwangi) Vol 1 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Abdiwangi
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Politeknik Negeri Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57203/abdiwangi.v1i1.2023.9-20

Abstract

Pertemuan Rukun Tetangga (RT) sebagai salah satu tempat untuk mendukung tugas-tugas RT. Dalam pertemuan RT ini dapat digunakan untuk rapat atau diskusi penentuan program-program pembangunan, pelaksanaan kegiatan, ataupun penyampaian informasi-informasi. Pertemuan RT di wilayah RT. 03 RW. 03 Bandulan diadakan satu kali dalam sebulan secara rutin pada minggu ke-2. Pertemuan ini dilaksanakan di depan atau halaman salah satu warga sampai dengan poros jalan sehingga saat pertemuan, fungsi jalan tersebut ditutup sementara. Melalui kegiatan pengabdian ini, akan diberikan alternatif desain kanopi balai pertemuan agar balai pertemuan tersebut menjadi nyaman. Desain kanopi balai pertemuan menggunakan material baja ringan, dengan rangka utama berupa profil C75 x 0,75 mm dan reng R33 – 0,45 mm. Atap kanopi yang digunakan berupa atap spandek dengan tebal 0,25 mm.
Urban Roadworthiness Adequacy Analysis Using Star Rating for Risk-Based Treatment Prioritization Dwi Ratnaningsih; Wahiddin Wahiddin; Sitti Safiatus Riskijah; Rifqah Rifqah
Asian Journal Science and Engineering Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Asian Journal Science and Engineering
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51278/ajse.vi.2999

Abstract

Growing urban traffic activity and complexity call for a more comprehensive evaluation of road conditions, one that considers safety alongside capacity. Sumbersari Street- Gajayana Street in Malang City is a strategic corridor linking an educational and residential area with the city center, and is also served by a Bus Rapid Transit line (Trans Jatim Corridor 1), yet an integrated roadworthiness adequacy evaluation of this corridor had never been conducted. This study analyzes the road's roadworthiness adequacy level using the star rating method, referring to Technical Guideline No. 06/P/BM/2024, and develops risk-based treatment priority recommendations. Primary data were collected through field surveys covering 15 consecutive segments of 100 meters each (13 mid-block segments and 2 three-arm intersection segments), capturing geometric attributes, road furniture, pedestrian facilities, and land use, which were processed into a Star Rating Score (SRS) for five motor vehicle crash types. The results show that all 13 mid-block segments (87% of the 15 segments assessed) achieved a 5-star rating (scores of 1.42-2.00), while the 2 intersection segments dropped to a 3-star rating (scores of 6.93 and 9.27), making their average score roughly 5.4 times that of the mid-block segments (based on two intersection segments only). Although the combined average SRS score (2.39) still falls within the 5-star category, a detailed analysis reveals that not a single segment has an adequate sidewalk on both sides of the road, 80% of segments lack pedestrian crossing facilities, and 4 segments near schools have no School Safety Zone. These findings show that the motor vehicle SRS score by design does not capture the facility deficiencies affecting vulnerable road users, so a 5-star motor vehicle rating should not be read as evidence of safety for pedestrians. Nine treatment recommendations were developed based on urgency and risk contribution, prioritizing the provision of sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, intersection channelization, and School Safety Zones.
Co-Authors Agustin Dita Lestari Armin Naibaho Nain Dhaniarti Raharjo Qomariah Ratih Indri Hapsari Rifqah Rifqah Sitti Safiatus Riskijah Wahiddin Wahiddin