Muhammad Ridho Akbar Eljatin
Universitas Syiah Kuala

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Functional and Inflammatory Outcomes of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review Nabila Risti Rachmadi; Muhammad Ridho Akbar Eljatin; Lathifa Nabila; Alif Al-Mathari
Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research Vol. 8 No. 5 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
Publisher : GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37287/ijghr.v8i5.2128

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disease characterised by persistent inflammation and functional impairment. Methotrexate remains the cornerstone therapy; however, its effects on physical function have not been consistently evaluated. To evaluate the effectiveness of methotrexate-based therapy on inflammatory control and physical function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, SpringerLink, and ScienceDirect for studies published between 2016 and 2025. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials involving adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate as monotherapy or combination therapy. The primary outcome was physical function assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), while secondary outcomes included disease activity measures. Eight randomised controlled trials were included. Methotrexate-based therapy consistently reduced disease activity across studies, with combination regimens generally demonstrating greater inflammatory suppression than monotherapy. Improvements in physical function were observed in several studies, particularly in combination therapy groups; however, these improvements were not consistently proportional to reductions in inflammatory activity. Functional outcomes were also reported heterogeneously across studies. Methotrexate-based therapy is effective in controlling inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis but does not consistently translate into proportional improvements in physical function. Persistent impairment may also be influenced by structural joint damage, chronic pain, fatigue, and psychosocial factors.  
Does Bone Marrow–Based Augmentation Improve Fusion Outcomes in Lumbar Spinal Fusion? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Muhammad Ridho Akbar Eljatin; Teuku Nanta Aulia
Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research Vol. 8 No. 6 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research: December 2026
Publisher : GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37287/ijghr.v8i6.2729

Abstract

Lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) is widely used for degenerative lumbar disorders, but pseudarthrosis remains a clinically relevant complication. Bone marrow–based augmentation has been proposed to enhance fusion while reducing reliance on conventional grafting. However, its comparative efficacy and safety remain uncertain. To evaluate the effects of bone marrow–based augmentation on radiographic fusion, clinical outcomes, perioperative outcomes, and safety following LSF. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched without publication-year restrictions for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating bone marrow aspirate, bone marrow concentrate, or bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in adults undergoing lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders. Of 366 records identified, seven RCTs published between 2008 and 2023, involving 367 participants, met the eligibility criteria. Data on radiographic fusion, clinical and functional outcomes, perioperative outcomes, and safety were extracted and synthesized narratively because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Seven RCTs involving 367 participants demonstrated heterogeneous effects on radiographic fusion. Higher fusion rates were observed with selected constructs, including bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells plus allograft, bone marrow concentrate plus allograft, and bone marrow aspirate plus local bone and hydroxyapatite, whereas other studies showed no significant benefit or lower fusion rates with specific graft combinations. Clinical outcomes generally improved in both groups without consistent between-group differences. Perioperative outcomes and reported safety events were broadly comparable, although safety reporting was inconsistent. Four studies had some concerns, and three had a high overall risk of bias. Bone marrow–based augmentation showed variable effects on fusion, with benefits observed only in selected graft constructs. Current evidence does not establish consistent superiority over conventional grafting for LSF.