Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurna lAntropologi Indonesia
Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin
Universitas Indonesia
Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Some Notes on Clifford Geertz’s Interpretive Anthropology Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin
Antropologi Indonesia No 49 (1991): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Salah satu persoalan dalam filsafat ilmu sosial adalah bagaimana menjelaskan (explain) tindakan-tindakan manusia yang beranekaragam secara ilmiah. Apakah kita dapat menerapkan metode-metode ilmu alam atau ada cara lain yang lebih tepat menjelaskannya? Para ilmuwan sosial masih terus berupaya menemukan the best way untuk menjelaskan gejala-gejala sosial meskipun mereka tetap belum puas. Thomas Kuhn berpendapat bahwa ilmu sosial - tidak seperti ilmu alam - masih terlibat dalam diskusi metodologi yang tidak habis-habisnya karena belum mampu mencapai suatu kesepakatan mengenai paradigma-paradigma umum untuk membatasi masalah-masalah dan prosedur penelitian. Artikel ini berusaha mendiskusikan pandangan interpretive dari Clifford Geertz dalam mengkaji kebudayaan dan masyarakat serta kedudukannya dalam konstelasi metodologi ilmu sosial. Ada 2 alasan mengapa perlu mendiskusikan masalah ini: (1) pandangan interpretive terhadap gejala-gejala sosial merupakan perkembangan penting dalam ilmu sosial selama 2 dasawarsa; (2) C.Geertz yang banyak dipengaruhi teori Talcott Parsons telah mengembangkan gagasan yang kaya dan luar biasa tentang bagaimana melihat dan menganalisis kebudayaan dan masyarakat. Perhatiannya tidak hanya pada masalah antropologi tetapi juga pada ilmu sosial pada umumnya.
Keluarga dan Rumah Tangga: Satuan Penelitian dalam Perubahan Masyarakat Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin
Antropologi Indonesia No 60 (1999): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Family and household are two concepts that have been blended into a single notion in most of the texts on kinship and social organization in the past, because, in many instances, they have interchangeably functions in many developed societies in which nuclear family type is the main reference. But, this situation is much different if we approach our developing societies-with special emphasis, urban-in terms of vastly and hardly social and economic changes. This article proposes to distinguish family and household concepts for analytical purposes. Household in its flexible form provides more promising space for dynamic anthropological research, especially in our society than the classical family concept. Selecting household as a common focus for anthropological research and analysis has both practical and theoretical justifications.
Kebijakan Otonomi Daerah: Otonomi Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Sosial Budaya Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin
Antropologi Indonesia No 65 (2001): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

It unfortunately reveals that regional autonomy, and so to education autonomy as an integral part of it, as reflected through UU No.22 Tahun 1999 has not touched the very basic of cultural values and process of democracy, one core element it should significantly contain with. Central as well as regional policy makers and politicians, especially, have spent much their time to physical need and financial balancing debates between central and locals and deliberately forget the intrinsic cultural issue of the term, that is democracy as a cultural value formation process. Taking our current national education situation into account this article tries to introduce some cultural principles education autonomy should aim at. Based on holism in cultural approach education autonomy should pay attention seriously to strengthening community support to education.
Integrasi Sosial Golongan Miskin di Perkotaan: Kajian Kasus di Jakarta Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 29, No 3 (2005): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study looks into the internal process of the urban poverty of Jakarta in terms of the flowering phenomena of building and maintaining specific social relations among the poor to fulfill their basic economic needs. These complex social relations and exchanges among the poor and non-poor-called social integration of the poor-make the boundaries between the two social categories blurred and flexible. The paradox of social and economic statuses of the people involved has made this integration possible. This phenomenon will make poverty reduction programs in Indonesia face more complicated problems. Key words: Urban poverty; specific social relations; poverty as process; poverty paradox; social integration.
Some Notes on Clifford Geertz’s Interpretive Anthropology Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Salah satu persoalan dalam filsafat ilmu sosial adalah bagaimana menjelaskan (explain) tindakan-tindakan manusia yang beranekaragam secara ilmiah. Apakah kita dapat menerapkan metode-metode ilmu alam atau ada cara lain yang lebih tepat untuk menjelaskannya? Para ilmuwan sosial masih terus berupaya menemukan the best way untuk menjelaskan gejala-gejala sosial meskipun mereka tetap belum puas. Thomas Kuhn berpendapat bahwa ilmu sosial-tidak seperti ilmu alam-masih terlibat dalam diskusi metodologi yang tidak habis-habisnya karena belum mampu mencapai suatu kesepakatan mengenai paradigma-paradigma umum untuk membatasi masalah-masalah dan prosedur penelitian. Artikel ini berusaha mendiskusikan pandangan interpretive dari Clifford Geertz dalam mengkaji kebudayaan dan masyarakat serta kedudukannya dalam konstelasi metodologi ilmu sosial. Ada dua alasan mengapa perlu mendiskusikan masalah ini: (1) pandangan interpretive terhadap gejala-gejala sosial merupakan perkembangan penting dalam ilmu sosial selama dua dasawarsa; (2) C. Geertz yang banyak dipengaruhi teori sistem Talcott Parsons telah mengembangkan gagasan yang kaya dan luar biasa tentang bagaimana melihat dan menganalisis kebudayaan dan masyarakat. Perhatiannya tidak hanya pada masalah antropologi tetapi juga pada ilmu sosial umumnya. Kata kunci: intrepretivisme; "thick description"; anti ekonomisme; anti reduksionisme.
Keluarga dan Rumah Tangga: Satuan Penelitian dalam Perubahan Masyarakat Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin
Antropologi Indonesia Vol 30, No 3 (2006): Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia
Publisher : Department of Anthropology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Family and household are two concepts that have been blended into a single notion in most of the texts on kinship and social organization in the past, because, in many instances, they have interchangeably functions in many developed societies in which nuclear family type is the main reference. But, this situation is much different if we approach our developing societies-with special emphasis, urban-in terms of vastly and hardly social and economic changes. This article proposes to distinguish family and household concepts for analytical purposes. Household in its flexible form provides more promising space for dynamic anthropological research, especially in our society than the classical family concept. Selecting household as a common focus for anthropological research and analysis has both practical and theoretical justifications. Key words: family; household; social change.
Co-Authors