Hiryadi
Postgraduate Programme, Master's Programme in Nursing, Universitas Muhammadiyah Banjarmasin, Banjarmasin, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perceived Social Support is Independently Associated with Adaptive Coping Among Women After Mastectomy: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Banjarmasin Fatimatuz Zahra; Yati Afiyanti; Hiryadi
Indonesian Community Empowerment Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Community Empowerment Journal
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/icejournal.v6i1.58

Abstract

Background: Mastectomy resolves a surgical problem but leaves a psychospiritual one, and the cancer survivor organisations supporting women after that surgery in Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan have no local evidence on which resource to strengthen first. Objective: To quantify the association of spiritual well-being and perceived social support with coping among women after mastectomy, to test whether coping differs by cancer stage or by time since surgery, and to identify which factor shows the stronger independent association once the other is held constant. Methods: This community-based analytical cross-sectional study assessed members of Yayasan Kanker Indonesia Banjarmasin and the Cancer Information and Support Center South Kalimantan (total sampling; n = 101, 81.5% of 124 enumerated members) at home with the FACIT-Sp-12, Brief COPE and MSPSS. Analysis used Spearman correlation with Bonett-Wright intervals, exact contingency tests, rank-based effect sizes and binary logistic regression with E-value sensitivity analysis. Results: Adaptive coping was present in 69.3% (95% CI 59.7-77.5). Coping correlated with spiritual well-being (ρ = 0.478, 95% CI 0.302-0.623) and with perceived social support (ρ = 0.569, 95% CI 0.408-0.696), both p < 0.001. Coping did not differ by cancer stage (p = 0.057, r = 0.189) or time since mastectomy (p = 0.101, ε² = 0.046). Adjusted, perceived social support was independently associated with adaptive coping (aOR = 4.63, 95% CI 1.67-12.80, p = 0.003) whereas spiritual well-being was not (aOR = 1.92, 95% CI 0.88-4.19, p = 0.099); the difference BETWEEN the coefficients was itself not significant (ratio of odds ratios 2.41, 95% CI 0.67-8.66, p = 0.179), so social support is independently associated with coping but is not established as the stronger resource. Conclusion: Strengthening perceived support through a survivor peer-educator cadre and family-inclusive counselling is the priority these data support for evaluation; spiritual care should not be displaced.
Perceived Stigma Outranks Social Support and Self-Esteem in Tuberculosis Quality of Life: A Nurse-Led Community Empowerment Diagnosis, Banjarmasin Dea Ayu Pengukir; Yati Afiyanti; Hiryadi; Solikin
Indonesian Community Empowerment Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Community Empowerment Journal
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/icejournal.v6i1.63

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis in Indonesia is a social as much as a biological problem, but empowerment programmes target adherence rather than stigma, and no South Kalimantan study has ranked the psychosocial determinants a nurse-led programme could act on. Objective: To rank perceived tuberculosis stigma, perceived social support and self-esteem by their association with quality of life among adults receiving treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis, so that a nurse-led community empowerment programme can act on the determinant that carries the greatest weight. Methods: Cross-sectional community diagnosis of 102 adults with pulmonary tuberculosis at the Lung Center ward and DOTS polyclinic, Ulin Regional General Hospital, Banjarmasin. Perceived and internalised tuberculosis stigma (28-item Indonesian scale), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF-derived), perceived social support (MSPSS) and self-esteem (Rosenberg scale) were measured. Multiple linear regression was used, and the standardised coefficients were contrasted using the covariance matrix recovered from the collinearity diagnostics and selected by the identity R² = β′Rβ. Results: Severe stigma affected 94.1%; the three stimuli explained 80.6% of the variance in quality of life (R² = 0.806): stigma β = −0.766 (95% CI −0.862 to −0.670; partial r = −0.848), self-esteem β = 0.229 (partial r = 0.423) and social support β = 0.201 (partial r = 0.401), all p < 0.001. Stigma outranked self-esteem by 0.537 and social support by 0.565 standardised units (both p < 0.001, in all 16 admissible reconstructions), while the two contextual stimuli did not differ (p = 0.716). Conclusion: Perceived stigma is the dominant modifiable correlate of quality of life in this catchment, and the ranking is tested rather than asserted. Nurse-led empowerment should place stigma reduction through kader, family psychoeducation and survivor peer educators ahead of individual counselling, monitoring the continuous score.