Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

GREEN PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLIER GOVERNANCE: CONNECTING ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA WITH OPERATIONAL VALUE Nazhira Nindya Padma Hanuun; Nia Riana
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): Jesocin : November
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on green procurement, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about supplier governance to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects green procurement, supplier governance, and stakeholder accountability through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: materiality, physical and financial connectivity, stakeholder accountability, transition governance, and credible disclosure. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.
INTEGRATING CLIMATE RISK INTO ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT: A GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR STRATEGIC RESILIENCE Nia Riana; Nida Garnida Fitrianti
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Jesocin : March
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on integrating climate risk into enterprise risk management, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about physical and financial connectivity to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects integrating climate risk into enterprise risk management, physical and financial connectivity, and stakeholder accountability through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: materiality, physical and financial connectivity, stakeholder accountability, transition governance, and credible disclosure. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.
PERFORMANCE DASHBOARDS WITHOUT METRIC GAMING: A GOVERNANCE MODEL FOR BALANCED AND TRACEABLE DECISIONS Maya Ariyanti; Nia Riana
Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum Vol. 3 No. 6 (2026): Jesocin : June
Publisher : Organisasi Kreatif Indonesia Emas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Organizations increasingly depend on performance dashboards without metric gaming, yet visible activity does not by itself demonstrate reliable capability or sustainable value. Fragmented responsibilities, weak evidence, and locally optimized metrics can cause decisions about capability development to create unmanaged exposure elsewhere. Aim: This article develops a governance framework that connects performance dashboards without metric gaming, capability development, and role clarity through five mutually reinforcing capabilities: inclusive participation, capability development, role clarity, fair accountability, and institutional learning. Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review. Established management research, professional standards, and institutional guidance are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, risk-control analysis, and proposition development. It does not report respondents, sample statistics, or causal estimates. Results: The synthesis indicates that performance becomes more resilient when decision rights, data definitions, controls, escalation paths, and learning routines are designed as one management system. The proposed model links each capability to observable evidence and balanced indicators. Contribution: The article offers an auditable implementation sequence and propositions that can be tested in later empirical research.