<![CDATA[This study aims to examine financial management practices through the analytical lenses of accountability and transparency within Islamic educational institutions. However, madrasahs often encounter structural operational challenges, including external bureaucratic delays, prolonged state audit timelines, and persistent reliance on manual bookkeeping systems. This qualitative study employed an empirical case study approach to investigate institutional financial workflows in depth. Primary data were gathered using structured interviews, direct field observations, and comprehensive documentary analysis involving key madrasah stakeholders. The collected qualitative data were systematically processed using thematic analysis, interactive data reduction, and triangulation methods to ensure analytical rigor. The findings reveal that financial governance is structured around participatory planning, merging Madrasah Self-Evaluation (EDM) with multi-stakeholder annual meetings. Accountability is further reinforced through strict structural segregation of duties, distinct fund isolation for BOS, SPP, and committee revenues, and alignment with Ministry of Finance guidelines. Supervision is maintained via a dual-track framework combining routine internal cross-checks with formal external audits by state auditing bodies (BPK and BPKP). Transparency operates under a calibrated model, utilizing dual-mode record-keeping with role-based access to safeguard data integrity while ensuring regulatory compliance. Future research should conduct multi-site quantitative or mixed-methods studies to evaluate the empirical impact of fully integrated digital financial management platforms across diverse madrasah contexts]]>
