Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Negeri
Encep Ahmad Yani
Universitas Pasundan
Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
The legal formulation of the spiritual marital bond in the division of joint property following divorce Encep Ahmad Yani; Yudi Prihartanto Soleh; Rusli Subrata
Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri
Publisher : Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/992820

Abstract

Article 1 of Law Number 1 of 1974 conceptualizes marriage as an institution requiring a balance between spouses’ external and inner obligations. However, judicial practice has not adequately considered the inner dimension, as judges tend to emphasize measurable economic contributions. This study examines the legal standing of the marital bond as a consideration in the division of joint property and formulates its legal construction following divorce. It employs a descriptive-analytical method, a normative juridical approach, and qualitative analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and judicial practice. Supreme Court Decision Number 477 K/Ag/2014, Stabat Religious Court Decision Number 606/Pdt.G/2011/PA.Stb., and Surabaya Religious High Court Decision Number 345/Pdt.G/2020/PTA.Sby. demonstrate that joint property division remains dominated by material considerations of economic contribution, whether through equal or proportional distribution, while the inner dimension of marriage remains insufficiently accommodated. From the perspective of maṣlaḥah, the marital bond should be assessed hierarchically through ḍarūriyyah (essential), ḥājiyyah (complementary), and taḥsīniyyah (enhancing) considerations. Incorporating this dimension is therefore essential to achieving substantive justice in the division of joint property following divorce.
Co-Authors Rusli Subrata Yudi Prihartanto Soleh