Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PALITA: Journal of Social - Religion Research MADDIKA: Journal Of Islamic Family Law
Abbas Langaji
IAIN Palopo
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Between Syarah and Ta’liq: A Critical Study of The Methodology and Concistency of al-Suyuthi al-Zahr al-Raba’ ‘Ala al-Mujtaba Karya al-Suyuthi Abbas Langaji
Palita: Journal of Social Religion Research Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Palita : Journal of Social Religion Research
Publisher : LP2M IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/pal.v8i2.12678

Abstract

Differences in how hadith scholars evaluate the quality of narrations indicate that the processes of tashih and taḍ'if are closely related to each muhaddith’s critical framework. Al-Hakim al-Naysaburi (321–405 AH), through al-Mustadrak ‘ala al-Sahihayn, is often characterized as tasahul (lenient). However, this characterization requires examination of the relationship between his theoretical criteria and their practical application. This study analyzes al-Hakim’s methodologies of hadith authentication and weakening and examines the consistency of their application in al-Mustadrak. A qualitative approach was employed through content analysis of al-Mustadrak, with Ma’rifat ‘Ulum al-Hadith serving as the primary framework for identifying al-Hakim’s theoretical criteria. The findings indicate that al-Hakim formulated four criteria for hadith authenticity, but only two were consistently reflected in his explicit evaluations, while hundreds of narrations were left without clear assessment. Quantitative evidence from al-Zahabi and Ibn al-Jawzi further indicates the presence of a substantial number of da’if, munkar, and even maudu’ narrations. The study concludes that al-Hakim’s leniency is better understood as a structural gap between his formulated criteria and their practical application, compounded by the unfinished compilation of al-Mustadrak at the time of his death.
THALAB AL-IMARAT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE HADITH Abbas Langaji
MADDIKA : Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Maddika: Journal Of Islamic Family Law
Publisher : UIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/maddika.v4i2.12684

Abstract

The phenomenon of political ambition and the pursuit of public office without considering capabilities frequently triggers crises in governance and leadership. Prophetic traditions (hadiths) explicitly warn and prohibit individuals from seeking leadership positions (thalab al-imarah). This study aims to examine the legal status and interpretation of hadiths prohibiting the request for public office through matn analysis (tahlil al-matn), resolve the apparent contradiction (ta’arudh) between hadith texts and Quranic narratives (Surah Yusuf: 55), and synthesize these prophetic values into the discourse of modern management science. Employing a qualitative library research method, this study adopts textual-hermeneutical and socio-historical approaches. Primary data were retrieved from Al-Kutub al-Tis’ah (focusing on narrations by Abu Dharr al-Ghifari and Abd al-Rahman bin Samurah) and analyzed via takhrij, asbab al-wurud, and the harmonizing method of al-jam’u wa al-tawfiq. The findings demonstrate that the prohibition against seeking office is not absolute-dogmatic, but rather sociological-conditional. The restriction specifically applies to unqualified individuals (dha'if) to prevent the betrayal of public trust. Conversely, offering oneself for a position is permissible and even recommended if driven by moral integrity, intellectual capacity, and public interest, as exemplified by Prophet Joseph (Yusuf). This reinterpretation aligns seamlessly with executive criteria in modern leadership science, which emphasizes competence, integrity, and managerial objectivity.
Co-Authors