Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Sri Yulianingsih
Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kategorisasi Hukum Deepfake Politik untuk Menentukan Batas Pertanggungjawaban atas Manipulasi Konten Digital Sri Yulianingsih; Rengga Kusuma Putra; Ahmad Zainudin
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik (PERKARA)
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/89yn4y56

Abstract

The development of generative artificial intelligence has accelerated the use of deepfakes in political communication while raising complex questions concerning the boundaries between freedom of expression, information manipulation, and legal accountability. These challenges arise because the synthetic nature of digital content does not, by itself, establish legal unlawfulness. This study aims to develop a legal categorisation framework for political deepfakes to determine the boundaries of legal accountability based on the characteristics and context of their use. The study employs normative legal research with qualitative and comparative legal approaches. Legal materials are analysed through six dimensions, namely nature, context, intent, deception, dissemination, and harm, which are subsequently mapped into normative categories according to their relevance to applicable legal norms. The findings demonstrate that political deepfakes should not be assessed through a binary distinction between legal and illegal content. The analysis establishes four normative categories: legitimate political expression, political satire, informational manipulation, and legally accountable deepfake. These categories form a continuum of legal responsibility that enables a more proportionate assessment of the legal relevance of synthetic political content. The stronger the elements of intent, deception, dissemination, and harm, the greater the potential for legal accountability. This framework provides a conceptual basis for developing regulation and law enforcement approaches that safeguard information integrity and democratic processes without imposing disproportionate restrictions on political freedom of expression.
Forensik Data dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Siber Analisis Jaringan Bukti Menggunakan Social Network Analysis Sri Yulianingsih; Methodius Kossay; Eni Endaryati
Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): OKTOBER: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik (JAKSA)
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/mtepra40

Abstract

The increasing complexity of cybercrime requires more adaptive evidentiary approaches capable of addressing the dynamic and interconnected nature of digital evidence. This study aims to examine the role of data forensics in cybercrime proof through the integration of Social Network Analysis (SNA) as a network-based analytical approach. The research employs a mixed methods approach with an explanatory sequential design, combining quantitative analysis of 120 case files with qualitative insights obtained from in-depth interviews with prosecutors, investigators, and digital forensic experts. The findings reveal that digital evidence forms complex network structures, where entities with high centrality values play significant roles as key actors and intermediaries in cybercrime activities. The application of SNA enables a more objective identification of actors’ involvement patterns and strengthens evidentiary construction by analyzing the interconnections among digital evidence. Theoretically, this study extends the paradigm of criminal evidence by incorporating a relational dimension into evidentiary analysis. Methodologically, it offers novelty by integrating SNA into criminal law research, an approach that remains underexplored, particularly in prosecutorial practices in Indonesia. The findings provide important implications for developing a more data-driven and adaptive evidentiary system in addressing cybercrime.
Co-Authors Ahmad Zainudin Eni Endaryati Methodius Kossay Rengga Kusuma Putra