Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

QS. Al-Hujurat [49]:11-12 in Ibn Kathir’s Interpretation: Qur’anic Ethics and Bullying Prevention in an Islamic School Agym Rian Saputra; Winda Sari
Jurnal test Vol 5 No 2 (2026): September
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58363/alfahmu.v5i2.1194

Abstract

Bullying remains a persistent challenge in educational settings, affecting students’ psychological well-being, social relationships, and learning experiences. This study examines Ibn Kathir’s interpretation of QS. Al-Hujurat [49]:11-12 and its relevance to bullying prevention at MAS Muallimin Medan. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, the study combines library and field research. Data were collected through analysis of Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir al-Qur’an al-’Azim, school observations, and semi-structured interviews with the principal, counseling teacher, Qur’anic interpretation teacher, homeroom teacher, and students. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis and the Miles and Huberman framework. The findings show that Ibn Kathir’s interpretation emphasizes interpersonal ethics through prohibitions against ridicule, insult, offensive labeling, negative suspicion, fault-finding, and backbiting. These principles correspond to forms of bullying identified at the research site, particularly verbal ridicule, derogatory labeling, excessive joking, and social exclusion. The study also finds that character education, teacher supervision, moral guidance, tabayyun, and parental involvement function as practical mechanisms for translating these Qur’anic values into school-based prevention. The study concludes that QS. Al-Hujurat [49]:11-12, as interpreted by Ibn Kathir, provides an ethical framework for fostering respectful relationships and preventing bullying in Islamic educational settings.
Kausalitas Moral dalam Kehancuran Kaum ʿĀd: Penafsiran Quraish Shihab dalam Tafsir al-Mishbah Fitrah Dalimunthe; Sahdin Hasibuan; Winda Sari
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial, dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/dq2t6j72

Abstract

The destruction of the ʿĀd people as depicted in the Qur’an involves not only the arrival of divine punishment but also reveals the interconnection between moral deviation, collective action, and civilizational vulnerability. This study examines how contemporary exegesis frames this causal relationship, specifically in Quraish Shihab’s Tafsir al-Mishbah. This study analyzes the structure of the ʿĀd people’s moral deviation, the chain of causality leading to their destruction, the relationship between human agency and sunnatullāh (divine laws governing the universe), and the patterns of civilizational vulnerability that emerge when power lacks moral orientation. The research uses a qualitative literature review, drawing on Tafsir al-Mishbah and relevant Qur’anic verses concerning the ʿĀd people as primary sources, supported by pertinent secondary sources. The analysis uses a thematic-analytical exegetical approach, tracing inter-verse connections, interpretive constructs, and moral cause-and-effect relationships within the narrative of destruction. The study yields four key findings. First, the deviation of the ʿĀd people formed a moral structure characterized by a sense of superiority, the abuse of power, and resistance to the corrective guidance of the Prophet Hūd. Second, this deviation progressed through rejection, defiance, and the reinforcement of collective behavior, ultimately culminating in destruction. Third, human agency remains the basis for accountability within the framework of sunnatullāh; thus, the destruction is not portrayed as purely deterministic. Fourth, physical strength, prosperity, and construction capabilities can transform into sources of vulnerability when they reinforce superiority and preclude moral correction. This study affirms moral causality as the pattern linking value orientation, collective action, and the fragility of civilizational resilience.