Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan
Aslati
UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
AI, Deepfakes, and Muslim Domestic Conflict: New Challenges of Islamic Family Law in the Age of Technology Aslati
Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol. 24 No. 3 (2026): Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan
Publisher : Universitas Islam KH. Achmad Muzakki Syah Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53515/alqodiri.v24i3.291

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence has made realistic synthetic audio, images, and video increasingly accessible, creating new risks when manipulated media is used within intimate and family relationships. This study examines deepfake-based cyber-domestic violence as a problem for Islamic family law and for the assessment of electronic evidence in Indonesia's Religious Courts. It uses qualitative library research with normative, philosophical, and socio-technological approaches, drawing on authoritative Islamic sources, Indonesian legal materials, and peer-reviewed scholarship on deepfakes, technology-facilitated abuse, digital forensics, and Islamic AI ethics. The analysis indicates that non-consensual intimate deepfakes, voice cloning, and fabricated digital records can intensify coercive control, damage personal and family honor, and complicate judicial assessment of authenticity. The study reconstructs al-bayyinah for the digital environment through three linked evidentiary dimensions: metadata and provenance integrity, documented chain of custody, and forensic expert assessment when authenticity is disputed. This framework is interpreted through hifz al-'ird, hifz al-nafs, tabayyun, and sadd al-dhari'ah, while distinguishing current Indonesian law from the reforms proposed by the author. The study concludes that Religious Courts require clearer procedures for contested synthetic evidence and closer coordination between family-law remedies, digital-forensic practice, and victim protection.
Co-Authors