Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Business and Quality Research Asia Pacific Journal of Business Economics and Technology Asia Pacific Journal of Business Economics and Technology
Arifin
Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo, Indonesia
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
George C. Edward III’s Policy Implementation Model in the Livable Housing Development Program in North Bolaang Mongondow Regency Supriadi Goma; Rahmisyari; Arifin
International Journal of Business and Quality Research Vol. 4 No. 04 (2026): October - December International Journal of Business and Quality Research (IJB
Publisher : Citakonsultindo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63922/ijbqr.v4i04.6851

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of the Livable Housing Development Program in North Bolaang Mongondow Regency using George C. Edward III’s policy implementation model. The analysis focuses on communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure, while also identifying contextual supporting and inhibiting factors. A qualitative case-study design was used. Data were designed to be obtained through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation involving purposively selected actors from the housing agency, field facilitators, sub-district and village governments, social affairs officials, beneficiaries, and an academic informant. Data analysis followed the Miles and Huberman interactive model and data credibility was addressed through source triangulation, technique triangulation, and member checking. The findings indicate that policy transmission has operated through formal and digital channels, but clarity and consistency remain uneven, particularly regarding beneficiary self-help obligations, material distribution schedules, and technical information. Resources are available but are constrained by personnel, operational support, logistics, fiscal capacity, and the integration of social and technical beneficiary data. Implementers generally show positive disposition and commitment, although support intensity varies across locations. The bureaucratic structure and division of roles are relatively clear, but special cases are handled slowly because escalation procedures are not sufficiently adaptive. Geographical conditions, weather, local mutual cooperation, builder availability, and beneficiary capacity strengthen or weaken implementation. The study recommends standardized beneficiary communication, improved facilitator-to-area allocation, integrated data verification, performance indicators for facilitation, and time-bound escalation procedures.
Effectiveness Of Risk Management-Based Budget Management In The Bolaang Mongondow Regency Government Sofiah Y. Matantu; Rahmisyari; Arifin; Darnawati
Asia Pacific Journal of Business Economics and Technology Vol. 6 No. 05 (2026): October - November
Publisher : Cita Konsultindo Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.98765/apjbet.v6i05.352

Abstract

This study analyzes the effectiveness of risk management-based Regional Budget (APBD) management in the Bolaang Mongondow Regency Government. The study addresses a SIPD paradox: despite four consecutive Unqualified Opinions (WTP) and full implementation of the Regional Government Information System (SIPD) since 2022, the region recorded a relatively high budget surplus (SILPA) of 8.34%, budget absorption in strategic regional agencies of 61–84%, achievement of RPJMD indicators of only 71.22%, and recurring internal oversight findings. A descriptive qualitative case-study approach was employed using the COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) 2017 and ISO 31000:2018 frameworks. Five key informants were selected from budget management and internal oversight functions. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and document review, and credibility was strengthened through source and technique triangulation. The findings show that five of eight COSO ERM components—control environment, objective setting, risk identification, risk response, and control activities—were effective, while risk assessment, information and communication, and monitoring were not yet effective. SIPD was effective as a preventive control but remained limited as a detective control for substantive waste. The main contribution is the identification of a SIPD paradox in which formal compliance and digital control do not automatically ensure substantive value for money when risk assessment remains manual and fragmented.
Effectiveness Of Risk Management-Based Budget Management In The Bolaang Mongondow Regency Government Sofiah Y. Matantu; Rahmisyari; Arifin; Darnawati
Asia Pacific Journal of Business Economics and Technology Vol. 6 No. 05 (2026): October - November
Publisher : Cita Konsultindo Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.98765/apjbet.v6i05.352

Abstract

This study analyzes the effectiveness of risk management-based Regional Budget (APBD) management in the Bolaang Mongondow Regency Government. The study addresses a SIPD paradox: despite four consecutive Unqualified Opinions (WTP) and full implementation of the Regional Government Information System (SIPD) since 2022, the region recorded a relatively high budget surplus (SILPA) of 8.34%, budget absorption in strategic regional agencies of 61–84%, achievement of RPJMD indicators of only 71.22%, and recurring internal oversight findings. A descriptive qualitative case-study approach was employed using the COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) 2017 and ISO 31000:2018 frameworks. Five key informants were selected from budget management and internal oversight functions. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and document review, and credibility was strengthened through source and technique triangulation. The findings show that five of eight COSO ERM components—control environment, objective setting, risk identification, risk response, and control activities—were effective, while risk assessment, information and communication, and monitoring were not yet effective. SIPD was effective as a preventive control but remained limited as a detective control for substantive waste. The main contribution is the identification of a SIPD paradox in which formal compliance and digital control do not automatically ensure substantive value for money when risk assessment remains manual and fragmented.
Co-Authors Darnawati Rahmisyari Sofiah Y. Matantu Supriadi Goma