Ferdian Harum Istikanto
Universitas Tarumanagara

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Global Urological Reconstruction Research Development in the Scopus Database: A Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer and Biblioshiny Ferdian Harum Istikanto; Ananda Firdaus; Richard Andre Lantemona
Glosains: Jurnal Sains Global Indonesia Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026): Glosains: Jurnal Sains Global Indonesia
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59784/glosains.v7i4.910

Abstract

Background: Urological reconstruction encompasses various clinical challenges, including urinary diversion, urethral and ureteral strictures, congenital anomalies, and neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Despite the rapid growth in publications, the global intellectual structure of this field remains insufficiently mapped. Objective: This study aims to identify research characteristics, trends, influential sources, key works, and conceptual themes in urological reconstruction. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using Scopus data retrieved on April 19, 2026, from the TITLE-ABS-KEY field using eight core phrases related to urological reconstruction. The data were exported and cleaned through synonym merging, removal of nonspecific terms, and keyword standardization, and were then analyzed using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer. Results: A total of 1,827 documents from 435 sources and 8,559 authors published during 2016–2026 were identified. Scientific production increased substantially after 2020, reaching its peak in 2025. The leading journals were Urology (181 documents), Journal of Pediatric Urology (102), and World Journal of Urology (70). Dominant keywords included urinary diversion, urethral stricture, urethroplasty, neurogenic bladder, and urethral reconstruction. Co-occurrence analysis revealed four major themes: post-cystectomy urinary diversion, urethral reconstruction, pediatric and neurogenic reconstruction, and ureteral reconstruction. Conclusion: Urological reconstruction research is concentrated around mature themes of urinary diversion and urethral reconstruction, while ureteral reconstruction and robotic techniques represent emerging areas. Tissue engineering remains a promising translational frontier requiring further clinical validation. Future studies should explore broader databases, collaboration networks, and long-term reconstructive outcomes.
Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Compared with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for 10-20 mm Renal Stones in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Richard Andre Lantemona; Ananda Firdaus; Ferdian Harum Istikanto; Indratama Budiwicaksono; Vania Alodia Tambunan
Glosains: Jurnal Sains Global Indonesia Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026): Glosains: Jurnal Sains Global Indonesia
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59784/glosains.v7i4.912

Abstract

Background: Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) are commonly used for pediatric renal stones; however, comparative evidence for stones measuring 10–20 mm remains limited and inconsistent. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of mini-PCNL versus ESWL in children with renal stones <2 cm. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Wiley Online Library were searched following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Comparative studies evaluating mini-PCNL and ESWL in pediatric renal stones <2 cm were included. Outcomes were analyzed using a DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model, while risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Results: Four studies (three randomized controlled trials and one retrospective cohort study) involving 455 patients (226 mini-PCNL and 229 ESWL) were included. Mini-PCNL demonstrated a higher stone-free rate (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.17–2.92) and lower retreatment rate (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07–0.50) compared with ESWL. However, sensitivity analysis showed reduced statistical certainty for stone-free rate (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.79–3.23). Complication rates were comparable between groups (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.86–1.73). Data on operative time and hospital stay were insufficient for pooled analysis. Risk of bias was high in randomized trials and moderate in the cohort study. Conclusion: Mini-PCNL may provide superior stone clearance and fewer retreatments than ESWL for pediatric renal stones <2 cm, but current evidence remains limited by study quality and heterogeneity. Further high-quality comparative studies are required.