Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hakam : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam
⁠Muhammad Muhib Rofiqo Qaula R.
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
RECONSTRUCTING JUDICIAL REASONING IN HADHANAH DISPUTES: A LEGAL-PHILOSOPHICAL EVALUATION MODEL BASED ON THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD Nurul Fadhilatul Hidayah; M Yakhsyallah Liddinillah; Nursafitri Nursafitri; Andi Afifah Buana Cinta; ⁠Muhammad Muhib Rofiqo Qaula R.; Usep Saepullah
JURNAL HAKAM Vol 10, No 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/jhi.v10i3.15993

Abstract

Hadhanah disputes require judges to reconcile Islamic family law, child protection norms, and the concrete interests of children. Existing studies predominantly examine custody rights, child protection, or gender justice, while insufficient attention has been given to evaluating the quality of judicial reasoning that constructs the best interests of the child. This study aims to develop a legal-philosophical model for evaluating judicial reasoning in hadhanah disputes. Employing normative legal research through statutory, conceptual, case, and legal-philosophical approaches, the study analyzes the Mempawah Religious Court Decision No. 354/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Mpw., Pontianak Religious High Court Decision No. 9/Pdt.G/2025/PTA.Ptk., and Supreme Court Decision No. 563 K/AG/2025. The findings show that judicial reasoning has a normative and philosophical basis, particularly in incorporating ḥifẓ al-dīn as an element of the child’s best interests. However, its adequacy depends on whether religious considerations are connected to the child’s concrete condition and proportionately weighed against psychological, educational, health, social, caregiving stability, and emotional interests. The study proposes a Judicial Reasoning Evaluation Model comprising five substantive parameters and five analytical stages. The model contributes an evaluative framework for assessing the quality of judicial argumentation and advancing substantive, child-centered justice in Islamic family law.
Co-Authors Andi Afifah Buana Cinta M Yakhsyallah Liddinillah Nursafitri Nursafitri Nurul Fadhilatul Hidayah Usep Saepullah