<![CDATA[General Background: Artificial Intelligence has expanded digital contractual relationships, including the use of ChatGPT by individual and corporate users. Specific Background: General users enter standard electronic contracts through Terms of Use, while ChatGPT Enterprise involves broader contractual arrangements concerning corporate data, information security, output ownership, liability, and organizational interests. Knowledge Gap: Previous studies have mainly examined the validity of AI-generated contracts, the legal position of AI, and AI use in commercial contracts, while specific comparisons between general ChatGPT users and corporate Enterprise users remain limited. Aims: This study examines differences in standard clauses, legal relationships, and legal protection between the two services within the Indonesian legal framework. Results: Using normative juridical research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study finds that general users have more limited bargaining positions and are more subject to provider-determined clauses, whereas Enterprise users receive broader contractual arrangements concerning data protection, information security, organizational control, and business interests. The analysis also identifies regulatory gaps, vague norms, and potential conflicts between platform policies and Indonesian law. Novelty: The study provides a comparative legal analysis of individual and corporate contractual relationships in AI-based digital services, focusing on standard clauses and the resulting legal position of the parties. Implications: The findings highlight the need for clearer legal regulation and adaptive contractual interpretation to provide legal certainty, balanced rights and obligations, and protection in AI-based electronic contracts. Key Findings Highlights General users have limited bargaining space under standardized service terms. Corporate arrangements provide broader controls over data, security, and organizational interests. AI-based contractual relationships raise regulatory gaps, vague responsibilities, and potential normative conflicts. Keywords : Standard Clauses, ChatGPT Enterprise, Electronic Contracts, Contract Law, Artificial Intelligence]]>
