This Author published in this journals
All Journal KEMBARA
Ermi Dyah Kurnia
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Gender representation and the interactional functions of humour in Cocote Tonggo: A sociolinguistic analysis Anisa Putri Wulandari; Prembayun Miji Lestari; Ermi Dyah Kurnia
KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): October (On Progress)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/kembara.v12i2.43174

Abstract

This study examines how linguistic choices, character relationships, joke targets, and recipient responses shape gender representation and the interactional functions of humour in Cocote Tonggo. It adopts a qualitative approach informed by sociolinguistics. The data consist of selected dialogue sequences in a researcher-prepared film transcript. The analysis considers linguistic form, conversational context, targets, and subsequent responses, distinguishing interpreted functions from unobserved effects. The transcript-based findings indicate that playful questioning and correction can organise humorous exchanges. A body analogy extended by another speaker demonstrates alignment among interlocutors while positioning an absent woman as an object of evaluation. Similarly, talk about another character’s English proficiency connects incongruity, shared laughter, and social judgment. By contrast, a coarse response to a polite offer establishes a speech-level contrast without independently demonstrating humorous acceptance. These findings suggest that gender representation must be examined through linguistic form, topic, character positioning, target, and response rather than speaker gender composition alone. The study contributes an account of humour as an interactional practice that can align speakers while disparaging others. Its findings are limited to selected cinematic dialogues and do not establish general characteristics of men’s or women’s language, humour frequency across the film, or audience effects. Prosodic and nonverbal interpretations require verification against the audiovisual source.