Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulumul Qur'an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir
Hikma Ramadhani
Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Critical Study of Makkiyah-Madaniyyah Classification on Qur’an Kemenag, Quran.com, and MyQuran Hikma Ramadhani; Hastuti; Jusmawati; Andi Tiara Patetei
Ulumul Qur'an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Ulumul Qur'an: September 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al-Quran dan Tafsir STIU Darul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58404/juq.v6i2.950

Abstract

This study critically examines the methodological frameworks used to determine Makkiyyah and Madaniyyah verse classifications in Quranic studies and analyzes their impact on the consistency of digital Quran applications. Using a qualitative approach with analytical-comparative library research, this study draws directly on al-Qattan Mabahis fi Ulum al-Quran as its primary source, while the methodological perspectives of al-Zarkasyi Al-Burhan fi Ulum al-Quran and al-Suyuti's Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Quran are incorporated through contemporary secondary literature that engages both works comparatively, alongside a purposive sample of digital Quran applications including Quran Kemenag, Quran.com, and MyQuran. Four competing theoretical frameworks (historical, geographical, subjective, and content-based) produce irreconcilable results for 12 disputed (khilafiyyah) surahs. Comparative data across platforms demonstrate that inconsistent source references cause divergent labelling of the same surahs, with Quran.com following international scholarly consensus while Indonesian applications adhere to the national Mushaf Standard. Critically, no application discloses the methodological basis of its classification or acknowledges scholarly disagreement (ikhtilaf), reducing complex ijtihad into binary data that risks misleading users in contextual Quranic interpretation, particularly in analyzing nasikh wa al-mansukh.
Co-Authors Andi Tiara Patetei Hastuti Jusmawati