Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Aspek Qira’at dalam al-Qur’an Ahmad Fauzan Pujianto
Salimiya: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Keagamaan Islam Vol 2 No 3 (2021): Salimiya
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Penerbitan dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) IAIFA Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (668.431 KB)

Abstract

The differences of the Arabs brought about the consequences of the birth of various qira'ah in reciting the Qur'an. This is actually natural, therefore, the Prophet himself justified the pronunciation of the Qur'an with various qira'ah. Qira'at qur'an experienced a golden age of existence from the 1st century to the 9th century Hijri, precisely until the time of Ibn Jazari (d. 833 H/1429 AD). After that until the decade of the 1970s gradually experienced a period of decline in the Islamic world including Indonesia. Majma' al-Buh}uth (Research Institute) al-Azhar Cairo in its Conference on 20-27 April 1971 AD, And the Central Indonesian Ulema Council on March 2, 1983 decided that Qira'at qur'an was not the result of Ijtihad, but Tauqifi which adheres to the history of mutawatir, and appealed to all Islamic countries to encourage the study of Qira'at in special educational institutions managed by Qira'at scholars who are trusted expertise. This article presents a brief study of the science of Qira'at, ranging from understanding, the status of verses that have different readings and forms to penance to the imam of qira'at.
Paradoks Otoritas Qirāʾāt: Ibn Shanabūdh, Ibn Mujāhid, dan Transformasi Legitimasi Qirā’āt dalam Politik Kekuasaan Abad ke-4 H Ahmad Fauzan Pujianto; Dika Purnama Aulia Rohma
JOM Vol 7 No 3 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, September
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/ijhss.v7i3.9901

Abstract

The punishment imposed on Ibn Shanabūdh has often been associated with the practice of qirāʾāt shādhdhah. However, the existence of such readings does not necessarily render them unworthy of scholarly investigation. The more important question is why a reading that possessed a transmission tradition became contested when it was openly practiced and taught. This study aims to analyze the factors underlying the punishment of Ibn Shanabūdh, the role of Ibn Mujāhid’s authority and Abbasid political power, and the boundary between qirāʾāt shādhdhah as an object of scholarly inquiry and as a practice of Qur’anic recitation. This study employs a qualitative method with a historical-critical approach, based on a literature review of classical sources on qirāʾāt, history, biography, and contemporary scholarship. The findings indicate that Ibn Shanabūdh’s punishment was not caused solely by his dissemination of qirāʾāt shādhdhah, but was related to his practice of reciting readings that diverged from the ʿUthmānic muṣḥaf, teaching and reciting them publicly, and maintaining these readings when they were challenged. The conflict subsequently developed into an institutional issue through the involvement of Ibn Mujāhid and Abbasid political authority. These findings underscore the importance of distinguishing qirāʾāt shādhdhah as a field of scholarly knowledge from their practice as Qur’anic recitations claimed to be legitimate in the public sphere.