Lina Sinaulan
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparison of Justice Collaborator Law in Indonesia and Thailand: Regulation and Case Handling Luqmanul Hakim; Lina Sinaulan; Joko Sriwidodo
Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (October - December 2025)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Review & Yayasan Sinergi Inovasi Bersama (SIBER)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/sijal.v3i2.325

Abstract

Justice collaborator is actually held to provide appreciation to perpetrators who cooperate in uncovering a crime in the form of reduced sentences or legal protection, so that the disclosure of a crime committed by law enforcement officers can be resolved more quickly. optimal, but in some countries there are states that regulate this Justice collaborator is specifically regulated in legislation specifically made regarding Justice collaborator, there are also those that regulate it generally in witness protection laws, such as those regulated in The Witness Protection Act BE 2546 of 2003, which is known in the regulation, the regulation regarding Justice collaborator is not regulated and mentioned specifically, however protection for parties who cooperate with law enforcement can receive special treatment ranging from physical protection, to reduced sentences if involved in a criminal act. This seems similar to the Justice Collaborator regulation regulated in Indonesia through Law Number 31 of 2014 and Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2011. However, there are actually many differences both in terms of legal regulations and the practice of Justice Collaborators between Indonesia and Thailand, and will be further discussed in this study. This study uses a normative juridical research method, with secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that there are differences in the existence of the term justice collaborator in regulations in Indonesia and Thailand, however, conceptually, both Indonesia and Thailand have the same concept and type of regulation and appreciation for justice collaborators. The differences in methods and implementation for perpetrators who cooperate or justice collaborators between Indonesia and Thailand are in the form of protection, institutions authorized to provide determinations, international cooperation, and the concept of submission by perpetrators who wish to request cooperation with law enforcement. 
Reconstruction of the Division of Governmental Affairs in Village Autonomy to Promote the Welfare of Rural Communities Mustarani; Lina Sinaulan; Erwin Owan Hermansyah
Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (October - December 2025)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Review & Yayasan Sinergi Inovasi Bersama (SIBER)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/sijal.v3i2.326

Abstract

The implementation of village autonomy in Indonesia has become a cornerstone of decentralization aimed at realizing equitable development and community welfare. However, the division of governmental affairs between central, regional, and village governments remains fragmented, overlapping, and often inconsistent with the principles of subsidiarity and local empowerment. This article critically reconstructs the legal and institutional framework governing the division of governmental affairs in the context of village autonomy. Using a normative juridical research method supported by conceptual and statutory approaches, the study examines the coherence of existing regulations—particularly Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages—with higher constitutional norms on local self-government. The findings reveal that excessive administrative control by higher levels of government has constrained the village’s autonomy to plan, execute, and finance its own development programs, thereby impeding the realization of welfare-oriented governance at the grassroots level. This paper proposes a reconstruction model that redefines the functional distribution of authority based on the principles of proportionality, subsidiarity, and participatory governance. Strengthening village autonomy through a clearer division of governmental affairs will enhance local accountability, encourage community-based innovation, and promote sustainable rural welfare as envisioned in the Indonesian Constitution.